PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICS vs. FDL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FICS vs. FDL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICS achieves a 0.83% return, which is significantly lower than FDL's 13.33% return.


FICS

1D
-0.83%
1M
1.05%
YTD
0.83%
6M
3.51%
1Y
3.46%
3Y*
9.67%
5Y*
4.92%
10Y*

FDL

1D
-0.26%
1M
-0.26%
YTD
13.33%
6M
14.76%
1Y
23.67%
3Y*
18.97%
5Y*
12.51%
10Y*
11.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICS vs. FDL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
FICS
First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF
0.83%20.44%2.59%18.07%-19.47%19.78%2.20%
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
13.33%14.79%17.98%2.94%6.66%26.10%-0.26%

Correlation

The correlation between FICS and FDL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2020

0.48

The correlation between FICS and FDL shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.50 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FICS vs. FDL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FICS
FDL

Financial Services

28.5%
15.1%

Industrials

27.8%
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

14.2%
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

10.0%
3.8%

Healthcare

9.7%
16.8%

Communication Services

4.0%
10.6%

Basic Materials

4.0%
0.3%

Energy

3.1%
27.3%

Technology

1.8%
1.1%

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

6.5%

Financial Services

FICS
28.5%
FDL
15.1%

Industrials

FICS
27.8%
FDL
3.8%

Consumer Defensive

FICS
14.2%
FDL
14.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FICS
10.0%
FDL
3.8%

Healthcare

FICS
9.7%
FDL
16.8%

Communication Services

FICS
4.0%
FDL
10.6%

Basic Materials

FICS
4.0%
FDL
0.3%

Energy

FICS
3.1%
FDL
27.3%

Technology

FICS
1.8%
FDL
1.1%

Real Estate

FICS

-

FDL

-

Utilities

FICS

-

FDL
6.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICS vs. FDL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICS
FICS Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
FICS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICS Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICS Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
FICS Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICS Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

FDL
FDL Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FDL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDL Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDL Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FDL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDL Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICS vs. FDL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) and First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FICSFDLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.78

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.06

1.37

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.34

5.56

-5.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.97

13.56

-12.59

FICS vs. FDL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICS Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the FDL Sharpe Ratio of 2.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICS and FDL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FICSFDLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.26

2.11

-1.85

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

0.88

-0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.66

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.45

-0.03

Drawdowns

FICS vs. FDL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICS drawdown since its inception was -29.16%, smaller than the maximum FDL drawdown of -65.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICS and FDL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICSFDLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.16%

-65.93%

+36.77%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.32%

-4.27%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.66%

-12.24%

+0.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.16%

-16.46%

-12.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.79%

-2.18%

-2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.21%

-9.66%

+2.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

1.75%

+1.85%

Volatility

FICS vs. FDL - Volatility Comparison

First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF (FICS) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund (FDL) at 2.85%. This indicates that FICS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FDL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICSFDLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.53%

2.85%

+1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.73%

7.87%

+2.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.26%

11.28%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.20%

14.31%

+2.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.94%

17.11%

-0.17%

FICS vs. FDL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FICS has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is higher than FDL's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

FICS vs. FDL - Dividend Comparison

FICS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.96%, less than FDL's 3.68% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDL
First Trust Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index Fund
3.68%4.04%4.96%4.58%3.58%4.59%4.48%3.75%3.97%3.18%2.93%3.65%
FICS
First Trust International Developed Capital Strength ETF
1.96%1.85%2.01%1.02%1.89%1.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FICS and FDL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FICS has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to FDL (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICS dropped -29.16% vs FDL's -65.93%.

On 5-year performance, FDL leads with 12.51% vs 4.92% for FICS. On fees, FDL is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, FDL has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FDL has performed better with a 12.51% return vs 4.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FDL is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.70% for FICS.

FDL has the higher dividend yield at 3.68%, compared with 1.96% for FICS.

FICS is categorized as Global Equities, while FDL is Large Cap Value Equities. FICS tracks The International Developed Capital Strength Index, while FDL tracks Morningstar Dividend Leaders Index. Their fees differ too: 0.70% for FICS and 0.45% for FDL.

FDL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.11 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICS and FDL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer