PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FICO vs. PDO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

FICO vs. PDO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FICO achieves a -30.25% return, which is significantly lower than PDO's -1.72% return.


FICO

1D
-0.52%
1M
10.76%
YTD
-30.25%
6M
-36.09%
1Y
-33.92%
3Y*
13.73%
5Y*
18.49%
10Y*
26.62%

PDO

1D
0.78%
1M
1.23%
YTD
-1.72%
6M
-1.43%
1Y
7.30%
3Y*
12.44%
5Y*
1.78%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FICO vs. PDO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
-30.25%-15.08%71.04%94.46%38.03%-15.23%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
-1.72%13.96%24.55%8.06%-23.40%5.98%

Correlation

The correlation between FICO and PDO is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2021

0.24

The correlation between FICO and PDO shifts across timeframes, from 0.05 (1 year) to 0.26 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FICO vs. PDO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FICO
FICO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
FICO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FICO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
FICO Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
FICO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
FICO Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

PDO
PDO Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
PDO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PDO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
PDO Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
PDO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
PDO Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FICO vs. PDO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FICOPDODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.82

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.90

1.16

-0.26

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.65

0.66

-1.31

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.24

2.29

-3.52

FICO vs. PDO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FICO Sharpe Ratio is -0.67, which is lower than the PDO Sharpe Ratio of 0.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FICO and PDO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FICO vs. PDO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FICO drawdown since its inception was -79.26%, which is greater than PDO's maximum drawdown of -36.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FICO and PDO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FICOPDODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.26%

-36.83%

-42.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-52.12%

-11.18%

-40.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-61.28%

-16.55%

-44.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.28%

-36.83%

-24.45%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-50.50%

-5.54%

-44.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.03%

-14.37%

-3.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.47%

3.20%

+24.27%

Volatility

FICO vs. PDO - Volatility Comparison

Fair Isaac Corporation (FICO) has a higher volatility of 14.33% compared to Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund (PDO) at 3.68%. This indicates that FICO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PDO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FICOPDODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.33%

3.68%

+10.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.21%

9.06%

+30.15%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

50.67%

10.08%

+40.59%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

40.73%

15.80%

+24.93%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

38.07%

15.54%

+22.53%

Dividends

FICO vs. PDO - Dividend Comparison

FICO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while PDO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.94%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FICO
Fair Isaac Corporation
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.07%0.08%
PDO
Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund
11.94%11.09%11.29%12.54%19.09%8.56%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

FICO vs. PDO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fair Isaac Corporation and Pimco Dynamic Income Opportunities Fund. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M700.00M20222023202420252026
691.68M
(FICO) Total Revenue
(PDO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


FICO and PDO have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FICO has higher volatility (14.33%) compared to PDO (3.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FICO dropped -79.26% vs PDO's -36.83%.

PDO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.73 vs -0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FICO and PDO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer