FHYS vs. UGA
FHYS (Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FHYS is a High Yield Bonds fund actively managed by Federated, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. FHYS is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FHYS returned 7.76%/yr vs 18.95%/yr for UGA. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FHYS charges 0.51%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
FHYS vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHYS achieves a 1.65% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 64.09% return.
FHYS
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- YTD
- 1.65%
- 6M
- 1.72%
- 1Y
- 5.76%
- 3Y*
- 7.76%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -12.11%
- YTD
- 64.09%
- 6M
- 60.42%
- 1Y
- 59.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.95%
- 5Y*
- 22.69%
- 10Y*
- 14.31%
FHYS vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHYS Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF | 1.65% | 7.72% | 7.23% | 10.88% | -7.31% | 0.73% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 64.09% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 2.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHYS and UGA is -0.32, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.32 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.09 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021 | 0.01 |
The correlation between FHYS and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.32 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHYS vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
FHYS
UGA
FHYS vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHYS | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.30 | +0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.48 | 3.17 | +0.31 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 17.86 | 9.39 | +8.47 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHYS vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHYS drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHYS and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHYS | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.62% | -86.59% | +74.97% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -1.66% | -18.96% | +17.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.16% | -26.68% | +23.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.12% | -18.05% | +17.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.26% | -36.69% | +34.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.32% | 6.43% | -6.11% |
Volatility
FHYS vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) is 0.64%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 9.24%. This indicates that FHYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHYS | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.64% | 9.24% | -8.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.20% | 30.57% | -28.37% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.69% | 35.22% | -32.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 34.45% | -29.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.92% | 37.22% | -32.30% |
FHYS vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHYS has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHYS vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
FHYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHYS Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF | 5.76% | 5.96% | 6.42% | 6.76% | 6.25% | 0.16% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FHYS and UGA have a correlation of -0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (9.24%) compared to FHYS (0.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHYS dropped -11.62% vs UGA's -86.59%.
On 3-year performance, UGA leads with 18.95% vs 7.76% for FHYS. On fees, FHYS is cheaper at 0.51% per year. On volatility, FHYS has been the lower-risk option at 0.64%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, UGA has performed better with a 18.95% return vs 7.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FHYS is cheaper with a 0.51% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
FHYS has the higher dividend yield at 5.76%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
FHYS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: Federated and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for FHYS and 0.75% for UGA.
FHYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.73), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHYS and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer