PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHYS vs. FTRB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHYS vs. FTRB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHYS achieves a 1.74% return, which is significantly higher than FTRB's 0.31% return.


FHYS

1D
-0.03%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.74%
6M
2.02%
1Y
6.13%
3Y*
7.79%
5Y*
10Y*

FTRB

1D
-0.18%
1M
0.67%
YTD
0.31%
6M
0.47%
1Y
5.00%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHYS vs. FTRB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FHYS
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF
1.74%7.72%7.47%
FTRB
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF
0.31%7.60%2.62%

Correlation

The correlation between FHYS and FTRB is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2024

0.40

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHYS vs. FTRB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHYS
FHYS Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank

FTRB
FTRB Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
FTRB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4141
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FTRB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FTRB Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
FTRB Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
FTRB Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHYS vs. FTRB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) and Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHYSFTRBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.53

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.26

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.70

1.79

+1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

19.00

5.30

+13.70

FHYS vs. FTRB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHYS Sharpe Ratio is 2.29, which is higher than the FTRB Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHYS and FTRB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHYS vs. FTRB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHYS drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, which is greater than FTRB's maximum drawdown of -4.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHYS and FTRB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHYSFTRBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-4.83%

-6.79%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.66%

-2.80%

+1.14%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.16%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.03%

-1.35%

+1.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.26%

-1.29%

-0.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.32%

0.94%

-0.62%

Volatility

FHYS vs. FTRB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) is 0.63%, while Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF (FTRB) has a volatility of 0.96%. This indicates that FHYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FTRB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHYSFTRBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.63%

0.96%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.21%

2.67%

-0.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.69%

3.58%

-0.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

4.93%

4.54%

+0.39%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.93%

4.54%

+0.39%

FHYS vs. FTRB - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHYS has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is higher than FTRB's 0.39% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHYS vs. FTRB - Dividend Comparison

FHYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.75%, more than FTRB's 4.29% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021
FHYS
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF
5.75%5.96%6.42%6.76%6.25%0.16%
FTRB
Federated Hermes Total Return Bond ETF
4.29%4.46%4.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHYS and FTRB have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FTRB has higher volatility (0.96%) compared to FHYS (0.63%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHYS dropped -11.62% vs FTRB's -4.83%.

On 1-year performance, FHYS leads with 6.13% vs 5.00% for FTRB. On fees, FTRB is cheaper at 0.39% per year. On volatility, FHYS has been the lower-risk option at 0.63%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FHYS has performed better with a 6.13% return vs 5.00%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FTRB is cheaper with a 0.39% expense ratio, compared with 0.51% for FHYS.

FHYS has the higher dividend yield at 5.75%, compared with 4.29% for FTRB.

FHYS is categorized as High Yield Bonds, while FTRB is Intermediate Core-Plus Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.51% for FHYS and 0.39% for FTRB.

FHYS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.29 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHYS and FTRB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer