PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHYS vs. PHYL
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FHYS vs. PHYL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FHYS vs. PHYL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FHYS
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF
-0.26%7.72%7.23%10.88%-7.31%0.98%
PHYL
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
-0.69%9.65%8.45%11.91%-11.80%0.97%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHYS achieves a -0.26% return, which is significantly higher than PHYL's -0.69% return.


FHYS

1D
0.72%
1M
-0.44%
YTD
-0.26%
6M
1.37%
1Y
6.26%
3Y*
7.37%
5Y*
10Y*

PHYL

1D
0.78%
1M
-1.59%
YTD
-0.69%
6M
0.68%
1Y
7.47%
3Y*
8.62%
5Y*
3.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FHYS vs. PHYL - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHYS has a 0.51% expense ratio, which is lower than PHYL's 0.53% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FHYS vs. PHYL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHYS
FHYS Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FHYS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHYS Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHYS Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
FHYS Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHYS Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

PHYL
PHYL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
PHYL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PHYL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
PHYL Omega Ratio Rank: 9191
Omega Ratio Rank
PHYL Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
PHYL Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHYS vs. PHYL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) and PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHYSPHYLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.42

1.68

-0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.08

2.35

-0.27

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

1.95

+0.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

12.68

9.37

+3.31

FHYS vs. PHYL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHYS Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the PHYL Sharpe Ratio of 1.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHYS and PHYL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHYSPHYLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.42

1.68

-0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.86

0.69

+0.17

Correlation

The correlation between FHYS and PHYL is 0.75, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FHYS vs. PHYL - Dividend Comparison

FHYS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.88%, less than PHYL's 7.88% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FHYS
Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF
5.88%5.96%6.42%6.76%6.25%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%
PHYL
PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF
7.88%7.05%8.28%7.62%6.55%6.13%7.51%7.31%1.79%

Drawdowns

FHYS vs. PHYL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHYS drawdown since its inception was -11.62%, smaller than the maximum PHYL drawdown of -22.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHYS and PHYL.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FHYSPHYLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.62%

-22.07%

+10.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.86%

-3.80%

+0.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.72%

-1.76%

+1.04%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.37%

-3.13%

+0.76%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.49%

0.79%

-0.30%

Volatility

FHYS vs. PHYL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes Short Duration High Yield ETF (FHYS) is 1.66%, while PGIM Active High Yield Bond ETF (PHYL) has a volatility of 1.88%. This indicates that FHYS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PHYL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FHYSPHYLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.66%

1.88%

-0.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.10%

2.50%

-0.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.42%

4.46%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.01%

5.66%

-0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.01%

7.73%

-2.72%