FHSNX vs. SCLAX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FHSNX (Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund) and SCLAX (SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 5 years, FHSNX returned 3.50%/yr vs 3.28%/yr for SCLAX. Their correlation of 0.88 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FHSNX charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.62%/yr for SCLAX.

Performance

FHSNX vs. SCLAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHSNX achieves a 5.21% return, which is significantly higher than SCLAX's 2.26% return.

FHSNX

• 1D: 0.80%
• 1M: -0.24%
• 6M: 3.22%
• YTD: 5.21%
• 1Y: 11.02%
• 3Y*: 9.13%
• 5Y*: 3.50%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 6.38%

SCLAX

• 1D: 0.29%
• 1M: -0.19%
• 6M: 1.46%
• YTD: 2.26%
• 1Y: 5.43%
• 3Y*: 5.49%
• 5Y*: 3.28%
• 10Y*: 3.16%
• ALL TIME*: 2.60%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FHSNX Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
SCLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FHSNX vs. SCLAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FHSNX Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund	5.21%	12.26%	7.18%	9.32%	-15.16%	5.16%	20.21%
SCLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund	2.26%	6.49%	4.92%	6.96%	-3.74%	1.72%	4.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FHSNX and SCLAX is 0.91, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.88
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2020	0.88

The correlation between FHSNX and SCLAX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FHSNX vs. SCLAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHSNX

FHSNX Risk / Return Rank: 76
FHSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
FHSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
FHSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 76
FHSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
FHSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 81

SCLAX

SCLAX Risk / Return Rank: 76
SCLAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
SCLAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 78
SCLAX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
SCLAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 72
SCLAX Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHSNX vs. SCLAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) and SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHSNX	SCLAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.77	1.85	-0.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.53	2.66	-0.13
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.36	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.42	2.31	+0.11
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	9.95	8.90	+1.05

FHSNX vs. SCLAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHSNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the SCLAX Sharpe Ratio of 1.85. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHSNX and SCLAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHSNX vs. SCLAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHSNX drawdown since its inception was -19.53%, which is greater than SCLAX's maximum drawdown of -5.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHSNX and SCLAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHSNX	SCLAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.53%	-5.59%	-13.94%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-4.41%	-2.32%	-2.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.73%	-3.41%	-2.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.53%	-5.59%	-13.94%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-5.59%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.14%	-0.48%	-0.66%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.75%	-1.14%	-3.61%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.07%	0.60%	+0.47%

Volatility

FHSNX vs. SCLAX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund (FHSNX) has a higher volatility of 1.83% compared to SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund (SCLAX) at 0.78%. This indicates that FHSNX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCLAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHSNX	SCLAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.83%	0.78%	+1.05%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	5.19%	2.33%	+2.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	6.05%	2.91%	+3.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	7.10%	3.12%	+3.98%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	7.33%	2.77%	+4.56%

FHSNX vs. SCLAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHSNX has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SCLAX's 0.62% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHSNX vs. SCLAX - Dividend Comparison

FHSNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.93%, more than SCLAX's 1.84% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHSNX Fidelity Health Savings Index Fund	2.72%	2.93%	3.06%	3.01%	3.71%	2.57%	1.62%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCLAX SEI Institutional Managed Trust Multi-Asset Capital Stability Fund	1.84%	1.88%	7.87%	4.06%	1.90%	2.79%	1.01%	4.67%	0.54%	3.77%	0.69%	1.18%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHSNX and SCLAX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, FHSNX and SCLAX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FHSNX or SCLAX?

FHSNX has higher volatility (1.83%) compared to SCLAX (0.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHSNX dropped -19.53% vs SCLAX's -5.59%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCLAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.