FHNFX vs. VT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FHNFX (Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund) and VT (Vanguard Total World Stock ETF) are both funds - FHNFX is a Government Bonds fund managed by Fidelity, while VT is a Global Equities fund tracking the FTSE Global All Cap Index. Over the past 5 years, FHNFX returned -0.07%/yr vs 10.99%/yr for VT. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. FHNFX charges 0.00%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VT.

Performance

FHNFX vs. VT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund (FHNFX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHNFX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly lower than VT's 12.24% return.

FHNFX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.22%
• YTD: 0.05%
• 6M: -0.17%
• 1Y: 4.08%
• 3Y*: 3.40%
• 5Y*: -0.07%
• 10Y*: —

VT

• 1D: -0.88%
• 1M: 4.91%
• YTD: 12.24%
• 6M: 13.14%
• 1Y: 29.24%
• 3Y*: 20.93%
• 5Y*: 10.99%
• 10Y*: 12.74%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHNFX vs. VT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHNFX Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund	0.05%	7.52%	1.03%	4.03%	-12.72%	-2.54%	7.50%	6.82%	1.65%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	12.24%	22.43%	16.49%	22.02%	-18.00%	18.27%	16.59%	26.81%	-12.94%

Correlation

The correlation between FHNFX and VT is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.26
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.19
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.10
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018	-0.04

The correlation between FHNFX and VT shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.26 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FHNFX vs. VT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHNFX

FHNFX Risk / Return Rank: 14
FHNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
FHNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 15
FHNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 13
FHNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
FHNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 14

VT

VT Risk / Return Rank: 67
VT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 68
VT Sortino Ratio Rank: 68
VT Omega Ratio Rank: 67
VT Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
VT Martin Ratio Rank: 71

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHNFX vs. VT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund (FHNFX) and Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FHNFX	VT	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	2.31	-1.26
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.62	3.20	-1.59
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.42	-0.23
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.32	3.04	-1.72
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.91	13.53	-9.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FHNFX vs. VT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHNFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the VT Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHNFX and VT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FHNFX	VT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	2.31	-1.26
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.01	0.69	-0.70
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.74	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.28	0.44	-0.16

Drawdowns

FHNFX vs. VT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHNFX drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum VT drawdown of -50.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHNFX and VT.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHNFX	VT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.42%	-50.27%	+30.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-3.02%	-9.67%	+6.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.38%	-16.51%	+11.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.71%	-26.38%	+9.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-34.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.98%	-0.88%	-5.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.73%	-7.02%	-0.71%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.02%	2.17%	-1.15%

Volatility

FHNFX vs. VT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund (FHNFX) is 1.16%, while Vanguard Total World Stock ETF (VT) has a volatility of 3.83%. This indicates that FHNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHNFX	VT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.16%	3.83%	-2.67%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.60%	10.17%	-7.57%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.79%	12.70%	-8.91%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.76%	16.05%	-10.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.43%	17.23%	-11.80%

FHNFX vs. VT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHNFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VT's 0.06% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

FHNFX vs. VT - Dividend Comparison

FHNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, more than VT's 1.59% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FHNFX Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund	3.82%	4.91%	3.69%	2.50%	1.30%	0.86%	2.69%	2.78%	1.02%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VT Vanguard Total World Stock ETF	1.59%	1.82%	1.95%	2.08%	2.20%	1.82%	1.66%	2.32%	2.53%	2.11%	2.39%	2.45%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHNFX and VT in my portfolio?

FHNFX and VT have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHNFX or VT?

VT has higher volatility (3.83%) compared to FHNFX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHNFX dropped -19.42% vs VT's -50.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.