PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHNFX vs. VGLT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHNFX vs. VGLT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund (FHNFX) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHNFX achieves a 0.05% return, which is significantly higher than VGLT's -0.41% return.


FHNFX

1D
0.00%
1M
0.22%
YTD
0.05%
6M
-0.17%
1Y
4.08%
3Y*
3.40%
5Y*
-0.07%
10Y*

VGLT

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.71%
YTD
-0.41%
6M
-1.68%
1Y
5.25%
3Y*
-0.72%
5Y*
-5.30%
10Y*
-1.10%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHNFX vs. VGLT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHNFX
Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund
0.05%7.52%1.03%4.03%-12.72%-2.54%7.50%6.82%1.65%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
-0.41%5.35%-6.28%3.27%-29.34%-4.98%17.57%14.30%1.63%

Correlation

The correlation between FHNFX and VGLT is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.91

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 4, 2018

0.93

The correlation between FHNFX and VGLT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHNFX vs. VGLT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHNFX
FHNFX Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
FHNFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHNFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHNFX Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
FHNFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1414
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHNFX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

VGLT
VGLT Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
VGLT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VGLT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
VGLT Omega Ratio Rank: 1616
Omega Ratio Rank
VGLT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
VGLT Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHNFX vs. VGLT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund (FHNFX) and Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHNFXVGLTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.46

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.70

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.10

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.32

0.75

+0.57

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.91

1.96

+1.95

FHNFX vs. VGLT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHNFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is higher than the VGLT Sharpe Ratio of 0.59. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHNFX and VGLT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHNFXVGLTDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.06

0.59

+0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

-0.37

+0.35

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.28

0.19

+0.09

Drawdowns

FHNFX vs. VGLT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHNFX drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, smaller than the maximum VGLT drawdown of -46.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHNFX and VGLT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHNFXVGLTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.42%

-46.18%

+26.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.02%

-7.01%

+3.99%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.38%

-17.68%

+12.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.71%

-40.98%

+24.27%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.98%

-36.83%

+30.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.73%

-15.06%

+7.33%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.02%

2.68%

-1.66%

Volatility

FHNFX vs. VGLT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund (FHNFX) is 1.16%, while Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF (VGLT) has a volatility of 2.59%. This indicates that FHNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VGLT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHNFXVGLTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.16%

2.59%

-1.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.60%

5.94%

-3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.79%

8.88%

-5.09%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.76%

14.58%

-8.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.43%

13.81%

-8.38%

FHNFX vs. VGLT - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHNFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than VGLT's 0.03% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FHNFX vs. VGLT - Dividend Comparison

FHNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%, less than VGLT's 4.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHNFX
Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund
3.82%4.91%3.69%2.50%1.30%0.86%2.69%2.78%1.02%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VGLT
Vanguard Long-Term Treasury ETF
4.61%4.44%4.33%3.33%2.84%1.82%2.15%2.46%2.71%2.55%2.69%3.21%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHNFX and VGLT have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VGLT has higher volatility (2.59%) compared to FHNFX (1.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHNFX dropped -19.42% vs VGLT's -46.18%.

FHNFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.06 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHNFX and VGLT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer