FHNFX vs. BNDW
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund (FHNFX) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW).
FHNFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Aug 17, 2018. BNDW is a passively managed fund by Vanguard that tracks the performance of the Bloomberg Global Aggregate Float Adjusted Composite Index. It was launched on Sep 4, 2018.
Performance
FHNFX vs. BNDW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHNFX vs. BNDW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHNFX Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund | -0.27% | 7.52% | 1.03% | 4.03% | -12.72% | -2.54% | 7.50% | 6.82% | 1.75% |
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 0.09% | 5.02% | 2.42% | 7.18% | -12.88% | -2.10% | 6.22% | 8.37% | 1.21% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHNFX achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly lower than BNDW's 0.09% return.
FHNFX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.61%
- YTD
- -0.27%
- 6M
- 0.24%
- 1Y
- 2.91%
- 3Y*
- 2.96%
- 5Y*
- -0.04%
- 10Y*
- —
BNDW
- 1D
- 0.13%
- 1M
- -1.46%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.53%
- 1Y
- 3.34%
- 3Y*
- 3.77%
- 5Y*
- 0.23%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHNFX vs. BNDW - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHNFX has a 0.00% expense ratio, which is lower than BNDW's 0.05% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
FHNFX vs. BNDW — Risk / Return Rank
FHNFX
BNDW
FHNFX vs. BNDW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund (FHNFX) and Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHNFX | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.78 | 0.95 | -0.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.15 | 1.34 | -0.19 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.14 | 1.17 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.60 | 1.35 | +0.26 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.29 | 4.95 | -0.65 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHNFX | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.78 | 0.95 | -0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.01 | 0.04 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | 0.37 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHNFX and BNDW is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FHNFX vs. BNDW - Dividend Comparison
FHNFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.76%, less than BNDW's 4.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHNFX Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund | 3.76% | 4.91% | 3.69% | 2.50% | 1.30% | 0.86% | 2.69% | 2.78% | 1.02% |
BNDW Vanguard Total World Bond ETF | 4.18% | 4.12% | 3.90% | 3.73% | 2.02% | 2.58% | 1.56% | 3.05% | 1.66% |
Drawdowns
FHNFX vs. BNDW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHNFX drawdown since its inception was -19.42%, which is greater than BNDW's maximum drawdown of -17.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHNFX and BNDW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHNFX | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.42% | -17.22% | -2.20% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.57% | -2.70% | +0.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.71% | -16.93% | +0.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.28% | -1.85% | -4.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -5.05% | -2.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.96% | 0.73% | +0.23% |
Volatility
FHNFX vs. BNDW - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fidelity Series Government Bond Index Fund (FHNFX) is 1.37%, while Vanguard Total World Bond ETF (BNDW) has a volatility of 1.67%. This indicates that FHNFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNDW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHNFX | BNDW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.37% | 1.67% | -0.30% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.54% | 2.29% | +0.25% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.28% | 3.53% | +0.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.75% | 5.17% | +0.58% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.46% | 4.92% | +0.54% |