PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHKAX vs. GOPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHKAX vs. GOPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and abrdn China A Share Equity Fund (GOPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


FHKAX

1D
2.61%
1M
7.19%
YTD
39.74%
6M
42.89%
1Y
86.17%
3Y*
33.75%
5Y*
8.78%
10Y*
15.07%

GOPIX

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FHKAX vs. GOPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FHKAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A
39.74%42.19%22.84%-0.60%-24.09%-13.95%47.37%34.71%-17.67%51.46%
GOPIX
abrdn China A Share Equity Fund
0.00%25.89%5.70%-24.96%-22.46%-3.67%56.93%31.74%-11.87%35.06%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKAX and GOPIX is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.71

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2012

0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between FHKAX and GOPIX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHKAX vs. GOPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FHKAX
FHKAX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
FHKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
FHKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank

GOPIX
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FHKAX vs. GOPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and abrdn China A Share Equity Fund (GOPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FHKAXGOPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

8.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.04

FHKAX vs. GOPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FHKAXGOPIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.68

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.38

Drawdowns

FHKAX vs. GOPIX - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHKAXGOPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-58.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.83%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-52.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-58.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.99%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.49%

Volatility

FHKAX vs. GOPIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHKAXGOPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.43%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

21.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.32%

FHKAX vs. GOPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GOPIX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHKAX vs. GOPIX - Dividend Comparison

FHKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than GOPIX's 1.46% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHKAX
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A
1.14%1.59%1.22%1.58%0.59%10.80%4.71%0.38%0.39%0.21%0.99%15.33%
GOPIX
abrdn China A Share Equity Fund
1.46%1.46%1.29%0.79%0.00%5.22%1.42%4.45%0.41%1.24%1.40%2.03%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHKAX and GOPIX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHKAX and GOPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer