FHKAX vs. FTBFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX).
FHKAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. FTBFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Oct 15, 2002.
Performance
FHKAX vs. FTBFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FHKAX vs. FTBFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 5.42% | 42.19% | 22.84% | -0.60% | -24.09% | -13.95% | 47.37% | 34.71% | -17.67% | 51.46% |
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | -0.49% | 7.50% | 2.50% | 7.25% | -13.58% | -0.44% | 9.34% | 9.89% | -0.66% | 4.19% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHKAX achieves a 5.42% return, which is significantly higher than FTBFX's -0.49% return. Over the past 10 years, FHKAX has outperformed FTBFX with an annualized return of 11.83%, while FTBFX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.58% annualized return.
FHKAX
- 1D
- -0.67%
- 1M
- -9.06%
- YTD
- 5.42%
- 6M
- 6.13%
- 1Y
- 43.43%
- 3Y*
- 19.54%
- 5Y*
- 2.51%
- 10Y*
- 11.83%
FTBFX
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -2.35%
- YTD
- -0.49%
- 6M
- 0.46%
- 1Y
- 4.07%
- 3Y*
- 4.43%
- 5Y*
- 0.85%
- 10Y*
- 2.58%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHKAX vs. FTBFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHKAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FTBFX's 0.45% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FHKAX vs. FTBFX — Risk / Return Rank
FHKAX
FTBFX
FHKAX vs. FTBFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FHKAX | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 1.10 | +0.76 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.39 | 1.57 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.34 | 1.20 | +0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.48 | 1.86 | +0.62 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.62 | 5.73 | +3.89 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FHKAX | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 1.10 | +0.76 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.11 | 0.15 | -0.05 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.54 | 0.55 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.93 | -0.62 |
Correlation
The correlation between FHKAX and FTBFX is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
FHKAX vs. FTBFX - Dividend Comparison
FHKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, less than FTBFX's 4.02% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 1.51% | 1.59% | 1.22% | 1.58% | 0.59% | 10.80% | 4.71% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.21% | 0.99% | 15.33% |
FTBFX Fidelity Total Bond Fund | 4.02% | 4.36% | 4.51% | 4.15% | 2.54% | 1.89% | 5.22% | 3.03% | 3.19% | 2.97% | 3.61% | 3.30% |
Drawdowns
FHKAX vs. FTBFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHKAX drawdown since its inception was -58.62%, which is greater than FTBFX's maximum drawdown of -18.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKAX and FTBFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHKAX | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -58.62% | -18.25% | -40.37% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.97% | -2.81% | -13.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -54.04% | -18.25% | -35.79% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -58.62% | -18.25% | -40.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.83% | -2.35% | -8.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -19.15% | -2.31% | -16.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.12% | 0.91% | +3.21% |
Volatility
FHKAX vs. FTBFX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) has a higher volatility of 9.26% compared to Fidelity Total Bond Fund (FTBFX) at 1.48%. This indicates that FHKAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTBFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FHKAX | FTBFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.26% | 1.48% | +7.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.44% | 2.46% | +13.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.16% | 4.30% | +18.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.95% | 5.62% | +18.33% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.09% | 4.70% | +17.39% |