FHKAX vs. FSKAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX).
FHKAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on May 9, 2008. FSKAX is managed by Fidelity.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: FHKAX or FSKAX.
Correlation
The correlation between FHKAX and FSKAX is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
FHKAX vs. FSKAX - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
FHKAX:
1.68
FSKAX:
1.64
FHKAX:
2.40
FSKAX:
2.23
FHKAX:
1.30
FSKAX:
1.30
FHKAX:
0.71
FSKAX:
2.52
FHKAX:
5.07
FSKAX:
9.94
FHKAX:
7.12%
FSKAX:
2.18%
FHKAX:
21.50%
FSKAX:
13.20%
FHKAX:
-62.60%
FSKAX:
-35.01%
FHKAX:
-33.75%
FSKAX:
-2.39%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FHKAX achieves a 10.97% return, which is significantly higher than FSKAX's 2.15% return. Over the past 10 years, FHKAX has underperformed FSKAX with an annualized return of 5.60%, while FSKAX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.12% annualized return.
FHKAX
10.97%
9.52%
17.60%
33.20%
2.34%
5.60%
FSKAX
2.15%
-1.58%
7.35%
19.22%
13.50%
12.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FHKAX vs. FSKAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHKAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than FSKAX's 0.02% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
FHKAX vs. FSKAX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
FHKAX
FSKAX
FHKAX vs. FSKAX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
FHKAX vs. FSKAX - Dividend Comparison
FHKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than FSKAX's 1.16% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A | 1.10% | 1.22% | 1.58% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.79% | 0.38% | 0.39% | 0.21% | 0.77% | 16.40% | 15.41% |
FSKAX Fidelity Total Market Index Fund | 1.16% | 1.19% | 1.41% | 1.62% | 1.15% | 1.45% | 1.80% | 2.06% | 1.66% | 1.82% | 1.96% | 1.63% |
Drawdowns
FHKAX vs. FSKAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHKAX drawdown since its inception was -62.60%, which is greater than FSKAX's maximum drawdown of -35.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKAX and FSKAX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
FHKAX vs. FSKAX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) has a higher volatility of 6.16% compared to Fidelity Total Market Index Fund (FSKAX) at 3.55%. This indicates that FHKAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSKAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.