FHKAX vs. ACEYX

Last updated Aug 2, 2026

FHKAX (Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A) and ACEYX (AB All China Equity Portfolio) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, FHKAX returned 8.62%/yr vs -0.93%/yr for ACEYX. Their correlation of 0.86 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FHKAX charges 1.21%/yr vs 1.25%/yr for ACEYX.

Performance

FHKAX vs. ACEYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHKAX achieves a 25.60% return, which is significantly higher than ACEYX's -1.57% return.

FHKAX

• 1D: 2.48%
• 1M: -4.88%
• 6M: 13.37%
• YTD: 25.60%
• 1Y: 52.27%
• 3Y*: 26.74%
• 5Y*: 8.62%
• 10Y*: 13.06%
• ALL TIME*: 8.32%

ACEYX

• 1D: 1.01%
• 1M: 1.94%
• 6M: -6.98%
• YTD: -1.57%
• 1Y: 12.22%
• 3Y*: 10.56%
• 5Y*: -0.93%
• 10Y*: —
• ALL TIME*: 1.95%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
ACEYX AB All China Equity Portfolio	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FHKAX vs. ACEYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A	25.60%	42.19%	22.84%	-0.60%	-24.09%	-13.95%	47.37%	34.71%	-15.97%
ACEYX AB All China Equity Portfolio	-1.57%	33.91%	17.44%	-10.96%	-26.65%	-14.65%	25.38%	37.67%	-21.60%

Correlation

The correlation between FHKAX and ACEYX is 0.75, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.75
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.79
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.84
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 25, 2018	0.86

The correlation between FHKAX and ACEYX shifts across timeframes, from 0.75 (1 year) to 0.86 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

FHKAX vs. ACEYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHKAX

FHKAX Risk / Return Rank: 83
FHKAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 83
FHKAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
FHKAX Omega Ratio Rank: 77
FHKAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
FHKAX Martin Ratio Rank: 88

ACEYX

ACEYX Risk / Return Rank: 12
ACEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
ACEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 12
ACEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 11
ACEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 13
ACEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHKAX vs. ACEYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) and AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FHKAX	ACEYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.99	0.47	+1.51
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.55	0.77	+1.78
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	1.09	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.00	0.68	+3.32
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.39	1.45	+9.94

FHKAX vs. ACEYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHKAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.99, which is higher than the ACEYX Sharpe Ratio of 0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHKAX and ACEYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FHKAX vs. ACEYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHKAX drawdown since its inception was -58.62%, roughly equal to the maximum ACEYX drawdown of -57.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHKAX and ACEYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FHKAX	ACEYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-58.62%	-57.58%	-1.04%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.29%	-14.14%	+1.85%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.15%	-21.83%	-0.32%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-48.34%	-47.59%	-0.75%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-58.62%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.12%	-26.98%	+16.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.87%	-27.73%	+8.86%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.31%	6.60%	-2.29%

Volatility

FHKAX vs. ACEYX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A (FHKAX) has a higher volatility of 8.72% compared to AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX) at 7.51%. This indicates that FHKAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ACEYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FHKAX	ACEYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.72%	7.51%	+1.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.80%	15.19%	+5.61%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.78%	20.26%	+4.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.69%	23.29%	+1.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.65%	23.58%	-0.93%

FHKAX vs. ACEYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHKAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is lower than ACEYX's 1.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

FHKAX vs. ACEYX - Dividend Comparison

FHKAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.27%, less than ACEYX's 5.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
ACEYX AB All China Equity Portfolio	5.04%	4.97%	3.75%	2.17%	1.39%	1.81%	0.43%	1.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FHKAX Fidelity Advisor China Region Fund Class A	1.27%	1.59%	1.22%	1.58%	0.59%	10.80%	4.71%	0.38%	0.39%	0.21%	0.99%	15.33%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FHKAX and ACEYX in my portfolio?

FHKAX and ACEYX have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FHKAX or ACEYX?

FHKAX has higher volatility (8.72%) compared to ACEYX (7.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHKAX dropped -58.62% vs ACEYX's -57.58%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FHKAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.