ACEYX vs. TRCLX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

ACEYX (AB All China Equity Portfolio) and TRCLX (T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ACEYX returned -3.47%/yr vs 2.38%/yr for TRCLX. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACEYX charges 1.25%/yr vs 1.04%/yr for TRCLX.

Performance

ACEYX vs. TRCLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX) and T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACEYX achieves a -1.38% return, which is significantly lower than TRCLX's 28.90% return.

ACEYX

• 1D: -1.28%
• 1M: -2.24%
• YTD: -1.38%
• 6M: -0.23%
• 1Y: 21.96%
• 3Y*: 12.92%
• 5Y*: -3.47%
• 10Y*: —

TRCLX

• 1D: -1.03%
• 1M: 2.88%
• YTD: 28.90%
• 6M: 32.36%
• 1Y: 66.01%
• 3Y*: 21.06%
• 5Y*: 2.38%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACEYX vs. TRCLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ACEYX AB All China Equity Portfolio	-1.38%	33.91%	17.44%	-10.96%	-26.65%	-14.65%	25.38%	5.40%
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund	28.90%	36.23%	10.95%	-15.51%	-26.24%	6.28%	59.73%	6.20%

Correlation

The correlation between ACEYX and TRCLX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.81
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.84
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.86
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2019	0.85

The correlation between ACEYX and TRCLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.86 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

ACEYX vs. TRCLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACEYX

ACEYX Risk / Return Rank: 17
ACEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
ACEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 17
ACEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
ACEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 16
ACEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 13

TRCLX

TRCLX Risk / Return Rank: 93
TRCLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 97
TRCLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 92
TRCLX Omega Ratio Rank: 88
TRCLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
TRCLX Martin Ratio Rank: 95

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACEYX vs. TRCLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX) and T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	ACEYX	TRCLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	3.71	-2.46
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.75	4.53	-2.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.62	-0.39
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.49	6.18	-4.68
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	3.92	22.20	-18.28
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

ACEYX vs. TRCLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACEYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the TRCLX Sharpe Ratio of 3.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACEYX and TRCLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	ACEYX	TRCLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	3.71	-2.46
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.15	0.10	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.09	0.55	-0.47

Drawdowns

ACEYX vs. TRCLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACEYX drawdown since its inception was -57.58%, which is greater than TRCLX's maximum drawdown of -50.67%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEYX and TRCLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	ACEYX	TRCLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-57.58%	-50.67%	-6.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.14%	-10.47%	-3.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.83%	-25.49%	+3.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-51.02%	-49.44%	-1.58%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-26.84%	-3.03%	-23.81%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-27.76%	-22.77%	-4.99%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.39%	2.91%	+2.48%

Volatility

ACEYX vs. TRCLX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX) is 6.10%, while T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund (TRCLX) has a volatility of 7.20%. This indicates that ACEYX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TRCLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	ACEYX	TRCLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.10%	7.20%	-1.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.80%	13.85%	-1.05%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.37%	18.18%	+0.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	23.31%	23.18%	+0.13%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	23.57%	23.42%	+0.15%

ACEYX vs. TRCLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACEYX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than TRCLX's 1.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

ACEYX vs. TRCLX - Dividend Comparison

ACEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than TRCLX's 1.27% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
ACEYX AB All China Equity Portfolio	5.03%	4.97%	3.75%	2.17%	1.39%	1.81%	0.43%	1.13%
TRCLX T. Rowe Price China Evolution Equity Fund	1.27%	1.64%	1.78%	2.56%	2.76%	8.23%	1.50%	0.01%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both ACEYX and TRCLX in my portfolio?

ACEYX and TRCLX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, ACEYX or TRCLX?

TRCLX has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to ACEYX (6.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACEYX dropped -57.58% vs TRCLX's -50.67%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TRCLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.71 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.