ACEYX vs. CHILX
ACEYX (AB All China Equity Portfolio) and CHILX (BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund) are both China Equities funds. Over the past 5 years, ACEYX returned -3.47%/yr vs 0.26%/yr for CHILX. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. ACEYX charges 1.25%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for CHILX.
Performance
ACEYX vs. CHILX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, ACEYX achieves a -1.38% return, which is significantly lower than CHILX's 12.02% return.
ACEYX
- 1D
- -1.28%
- 1M
- -2.24%
- YTD
- -1.38%
- 6M
- -0.23%
- 1Y
- 21.96%
- 3Y*
- 12.92%
- 5Y*
- -3.47%
- 10Y*
- —
CHILX
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 1.54%
- YTD
- 12.02%
- 6M
- 16.64%
- 1Y
- 40.72%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 0.26%
- 10Y*
- —
ACEYX vs. CHILX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEYX AB All China Equity Portfolio | -1.38% | 33.91% | 17.44% | -10.96% | -26.65% | -14.65% | 25.38% | 42.95% |
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 12.02% | 26.30% | 15.44% | -12.29% | -28.54% | 3.54% | 48.69% | 48.44% |
Correlation
The correlation between ACEYX and CHILX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2019 | 0.84 |
The correlation between ACEYX and CHILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
ACEYX vs. CHILX — Risk / Return Rank
ACEYX
CHILX
ACEYX vs. CHILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| ACEYX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.25 | 2.49 | -1.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.75 | 3.34 | -1.59 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.43 | -0.21 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.49 | 4.63 | -3.14 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.92 | 14.92 | -11.00 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| ACEYX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.25 | 2.49 | -1.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.15 | 0.01 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.09 | 0.56 | -0.47 |
Drawdowns
ACEYX vs. CHILX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum ACEYX drawdown since its inception was -57.58%, which is greater than CHILX's maximum drawdown of -47.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEYX and CHILX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| ACEYX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.58% | -47.73% | -9.85% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.14% | -8.54% | -5.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.83% | -22.59% | +0.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -51.02% | -43.88% | -7.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -26.84% | -6.28% | -20.56% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.76% | -20.48% | -7.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.39% | 2.65% | +2.74% |
Volatility
ACEYX vs. CHILX - Volatility Comparison
AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) have volatilities of 6.10% and 5.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| ACEYX | CHILX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.10% | 5.89% | +0.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.80% | 11.82% | +0.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.37% | 16.48% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.31% | 20.27% | +3.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.57% | 21.84% | +1.73% |
ACEYX vs. CHILX - Expense Ratio Comparison
ACEYX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CHILX's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
ACEYX vs. CHILX - Dividend Comparison
ACEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than CHILX's 2.62% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ACEYX AB All China Equity Portfolio | 5.03% | 4.97% | 3.75% | 2.17% | 1.39% | 1.81% | 0.43% | 1.13% |
CHILX BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund | 2.62% | 2.94% | 2.11% | 2.02% | 0.92% | 1.19% | 3.64% | 12.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
ACEYX and CHILX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ACEYX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to CHILX (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACEYX dropped -57.58% vs CHILX's -47.73%.
CHILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for ACEYX and CHILX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer