PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ACEYX vs. CHILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ACEYX vs. CHILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, ACEYX achieves a -1.38% return, which is significantly lower than CHILX's 12.02% return.


ACEYX

1D
-1.28%
1M
-2.24%
YTD
-1.38%
6M
-0.23%
1Y
21.96%
3Y*
12.92%
5Y*
-3.47%
10Y*

CHILX

1D
-1.11%
1M
1.54%
YTD
12.02%
6M
16.64%
1Y
40.72%
3Y*
12.93%
5Y*
0.26%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ACEYX vs. CHILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
ACEYX
AB All China Equity Portfolio
-1.38%33.91%17.44%-10.96%-26.65%-14.65%25.38%42.95%
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
12.02%26.30%15.44%-12.29%-28.54%3.54%48.69%48.44%

Correlation

The correlation between ACEYX and CHILX is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.84

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2019

0.84

The correlation between ACEYX and CHILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.82 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ACEYX vs. CHILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ACEYX
ACEYX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
ACEYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ACEYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
ACEYX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
ACEYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1616
Calmar Ratio Rank
ACEYX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

CHILX
CHILX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
CHILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CHILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
CHILX Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
CHILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
CHILX Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ACEYX vs. CHILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


ACEYXCHILXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.25

2.49

-1.24

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.75

3.34

-1.59

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.43

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.49

4.63

-3.14

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.92

14.92

-11.00

ACEYX vs. CHILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ACEYX Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is lower than the CHILX Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ACEYX and CHILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


ACEYXCHILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.25

2.49

-1.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.15

0.01

-0.16

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.56

-0.47

Drawdowns

ACEYX vs. CHILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ACEYX drawdown since its inception was -57.58%, which is greater than CHILX's maximum drawdown of -47.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ACEYX and CHILX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ACEYXCHILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.58%

-47.73%

-9.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.14%

-8.54%

-5.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.83%

-22.59%

+0.76%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-51.02%

-43.88%

-7.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.84%

-6.28%

-20.56%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-27.76%

-20.48%

-7.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.39%

2.65%

+2.74%

Volatility

ACEYX vs. CHILX - Volatility Comparison

AB All China Equity Portfolio (ACEYX) and BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund (CHILX) have volatilities of 6.10% and 5.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ACEYXCHILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.10%

5.89%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.80%

11.82%

+0.98%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.37%

16.48%

+1.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

23.31%

20.27%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.57%

21.84%

+1.73%

ACEYX vs. CHILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

ACEYX has a 1.25% expense ratio, which is higher than CHILX's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

ACEYX vs. CHILX - Dividend Comparison

ACEYX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.03%, more than CHILX's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
ACEYX
AB All China Equity Portfolio
5.03%4.97%3.75%2.17%1.39%1.81%0.43%1.13%
CHILX
BlackRock China A Opportunities Fund
2.62%2.94%2.11%2.02%0.92%1.19%3.64%12.77%

Frequently Asked Questions


ACEYX and CHILX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ACEYX has higher volatility (6.10%) compared to CHILX (5.89%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ACEYX dropped -57.58% vs CHILX's -47.73%.

CHILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 1.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ACEYX and CHILX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer