FHABX vs. FFFCX
FHABX (Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class A) and FFFCX (Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund) are both Target Retirement Date funds from Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FHABX returned 2.76%/yr vs 3.26%/yr for FFFCX. Their 0.98 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FHABX charges 0.66%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for FFFCX.
Performance
FHABX vs. FFFCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with FHABX having a 4.13% return and FFFCX slightly higher at 4.31%.
FHABX
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- -0.54%
- 6M
- 2.70%
- YTD
- 4.13%
- 1Y
- 8.68%
- 3Y*
- 7.78%
- 5Y*
- 2.76%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 4.68%
FFFCX
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- -0.65%
- 6M
- 2.78%
- YTD
- 4.31%
- 1Y
- 8.92%
- 3Y*
- 8.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.26%
- 10Y*
- 5.54%
- ALL TIME*
- 6.01%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 | |
| $0.00 | $0.00 | $0.00 |
FHABX vs. FFFCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FHABX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class A | 4.13% | 10.84% | 4.74% | 9.46% | -13.82% | 4.88% | 10.39% | 14.06% | -4.67% |
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | 4.31% | 11.39% | 5.26% | 9.82% | -13.21% | 5.64% | 11.09% | 14.34% | -4.93% |
Correlation
The correlation between FHABX and FFFCX is 0.98 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.98 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.98 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.99 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018 | 0.98 |
The correlation between FHABX and FFFCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FHABX vs. FFFCX — Risk / Return Rank
FHABX
FFFCX
FHABX vs. FFFCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class A (FHABX) and Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FHABX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.32 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.19 | 2.30 | -0.10 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 9.28 | -0.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FHABX vs. FFFCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FHABX drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum FFFCX drawdown of -36.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHABX and FFFCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FHABX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.83% | -36.88% | +18.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.07% | -4.00% | -0.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -4.92% | -4.77% | -0.15% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.83% | -18.35% | -0.48% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -18.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.15% | -1.17% | +0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.02% | -4.55% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.00% | 0.99% | +0.01% |
Volatility
FHABX vs. FFFCX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class A (FHABX) has a higher volatility of 1.86% compared to Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund (FFFCX) at 1.73%. This indicates that FHABX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FFFCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FHABX | FFFCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.86% | 1.73% | +0.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.95% | 4.92% | +0.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 5.63% | 5.59% | +0.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.52% | 6.49% | +0.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.71% | 6.27% | +0.44% |
FHABX vs. FFFCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FHABX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is higher than FFFCX's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
FHABX vs. FFFCX - Dividend Comparison
FHABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than FFFCX's 4.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFFCX Fidelity Freedom 2010 Fund | 4.70% | 4.97% | 2.99% | 2.72% | 7.23% | 9.33% | 6.01% | 5.78% | 6.98% | 4.82% | 3.22% | 3.68% |
FHABX Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class A | 2.55% | 2.67% | 2.42% | 2.36% | 4.96% | 5.78% | 3.33% | 2.06% | 1.95% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.98, FHABX and FFFCX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FHABX has higher volatility (1.86%) compared to FFFCX (1.73%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHABX dropped -18.83% vs FFFCX's -36.88%.
FFFCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.64 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FHABX and FFFCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer