PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FHABX vs. FPHAX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FHABX vs. FPHAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class A (FHABX) and Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FHABX achieves a 4.13% return, which is significantly lower than FPHAX's 11.86% return.


FHABX

1D
0.09%
1M
-0.54%
6M
2.70%
YTD
4.13%
1Y
8.68%
3Y*
7.78%
5Y*
2.76%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.68%

FPHAX

1D
-0.82%
1M
-5.31%
6M
8.15%
YTD
11.86%
1Y
47.75%
3Y*
19.16%
5Y*
12.79%
10Y*
11.46%
ALL TIME*
9.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

FHABX vs. FPHAX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
FHABX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class A
4.13%10.84%4.74%9.46%-13.82%4.88%10.39%14.06%-4.67%
FPHAX
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio
11.86%30.41%9.39%12.54%0.94%11.79%11.16%31.73%-8.84%

Correlation

The correlation between FHABX and FPHAX is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.33

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2018

0.53

The correlation between FHABX and FPHAX shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (1 year) to 0.53 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FHABX vs. FPHAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FHABX
FHABX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
FHABX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHABX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHABX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FHABX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHABX Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

FPHAX
FPHAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
FPHAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FPHAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
FPHAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
FPHAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
FPHAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9393
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FHABX vs. FPHAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class A (FHABX) and Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FHABXFPHAXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.89

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.41

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.19

4.81

-2.62

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

14.53

-5.65

FHABX vs. FPHAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FHABX Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is lower than the FPHAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FHABX and FPHAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FHABX vs. FPHAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FHABX drawdown since its inception was -18.83%, smaller than the maximum FPHAX drawdown of -38.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FHABX and FPHAX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FHABXFPHAXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.83%

-38.26%

+19.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.07%

-10.33%

+6.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.92%

-28.82%

+23.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.83%

-28.82%

+9.99%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-28.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.15%

-6.02%

+4.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.02%

-9.13%

+5.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.00%

3.41%

-2.41%

Volatility

FHABX vs. FPHAX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class A (FHABX) is 1.86%, while Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio (FPHAX) has a volatility of 6.44%. This indicates that FHABX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FPHAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FHABXFPHAXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.86%

6.44%

-4.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.95%

15.28%

-10.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.63%

20.25%

-14.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.52%

18.35%

-11.83%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.71%

17.93%

-11.22%

FHABX vs. FPHAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FHABX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than FPHAX's 0.67% expense ratio.


Dividends

FHABX vs. FPHAX - Dividend Comparison

FHABX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.55%, less than FPHAX's 4.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHABX
Fidelity Advisor Freedom Blend 2010 Fund Class A
2.55%2.67%2.42%2.36%4.96%5.78%3.33%2.06%1.95%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FPHAX
Fidelity Select Pharmaceuticals Portfolio
4.97%5.68%1.90%8.08%5.18%11.09%8.85%8.33%1.65%1.62%1.07%12.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


FHABX and FPHAX have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FPHAX has higher volatility (6.44%) compared to FHABX (1.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FHABX dropped -18.83% vs FPHAX's -38.26%.

FPHAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FHABX and FPHAX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer