FGTIX vs. FWAFX
Compare and contrast key facts about Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX).
FGTIX is managed by Franklin Templeton. It was launched on Dec 30, 1996. FWAFX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 19, 2009.
Performance
FGTIX vs. FWAFX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGTIX vs. FWAFX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGTIX Franklin Growth Allocation Fund | -4.56% | 17.82% | 15.13% | 17.62% | -17.12% | 16.39% | 14.54% | 21.85% | -6.45% | 18.06% |
FWAFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A | -6.91% | 15.83% | 27.27% | 24.62% | -25.96% | 18.13% | 30.57% | 28.58% | -4.80% | 29.15% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGTIX achieves a -4.56% return, which is significantly higher than FWAFX's -6.91% return. Over the past 10 years, FGTIX has underperformed FWAFX with an annualized return of 9.11%, while FWAFX has yielded a comparatively higher 12.14% annualized return.
FGTIX
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -4.56%
- 6M
- -1.79%
- 1Y
- 13.57%
- 3Y*
- 12.93%
- 5Y*
- 7.20%
- 10Y*
- 9.11%
FWAFX
- 1D
- -1.26%
- 1M
- -10.40%
- YTD
- -6.91%
- 6M
- -5.51%
- 1Y
- 17.55%
- 3Y*
- 16.98%
- 5Y*
- 7.91%
- 10Y*
- 12.14%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGTIX vs. FWAFX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGTIX has a 0.66% expense ratio, which is lower than FWAFX's 1.29% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGTIX vs. FWAFX — Risk / Return Rank
FGTIX
FWAFX
FGTIX vs. FWAFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) and Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGTIX | FWAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.02 | 0.85 | +0.17 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.53 | 1.27 | +0.26 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.18 | +0.04 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.22 | 1.25 | -0.03 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.85 | 4.88 | +0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGTIX | FWAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 0.85 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.43 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.66 | 0.65 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.50 | 0.69 | -0.19 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGTIX and FWAFX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGTIX vs. FWAFX - Dividend Comparison
FGTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%, less than FWAFX's 12.43% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGTIX Franklin Growth Allocation Fund | 9.41% | 8.98% | 2.27% | 3.28% | 4.93% | 14.27% | 5.11% | 11.14% | 9.45% | 6.22% | 2.70% | 6.36% |
FWAFX Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A | 12.43% | 11.57% | 14.70% | 0.66% | 6.00% | 12.73% | 8.01% | 4.71% | 9.43% | 6.66% | 0.88% | 3.72% |
Drawdowns
FGTIX vs. FWAFX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGTIX drawdown since its inception was -46.40%, which is greater than FWAFX's maximum drawdown of -33.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTIX and FWAFX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGTIX | FWAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.40% | -33.90% | -12.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.08% | -11.77% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.56% | -33.90% | +2.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -31.56% | -33.90% | +2.34% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.16% | -11.77% | +3.61% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.21% | -6.24% | -3.97% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.10% | 3.01% | -0.91% |
Volatility
FGTIX vs. FWAFX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Franklin Growth Allocation Fund (FGTIX) is 4.16%, while Fidelity Advisor Worldwide Fund Class A (FWAFX) has a volatility of 6.83%. This indicates that FGTIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWAFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGTIX | FWAFX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.16% | 6.83% | -2.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.83% | 12.89% | -5.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.73% | 19.93% | -6.20% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 18.66% | -3.71% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.81% | 18.62% | -4.81% |