PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGTAX vs. BKTSX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGTAX vs. BKTSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGTAX achieves a 10.34% return, which is significantly lower than BKTSX's 11.73% return. Over the past 10 years, FGTAX has outperformed BKTSX with an annualized return of 16.25%, while BKTSX has yielded a comparatively lower 15.13% annualized return.


FGTAX

1D
-0.32%
1M
3.36%
YTD
10.34%
6M
12.25%
1Y
30.98%
3Y*
25.22%
5Y*
15.99%
10Y*
16.25%

BKTSX

1D
0.23%
1M
5.68%
YTD
11.73%
6M
11.61%
1Y
28.67%
3Y*
22.30%
5Y*
13.12%
10Y*
15.13%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGTAX vs. BKTSX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGTAX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A
10.34%26.58%25.62%26.18%-9.26%25.98%12.59%30.74%-7.68%17.54%
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
11.73%17.15%23.83%26.02%-19.05%25.56%20.82%31.12%-5.37%21.02%

Correlation

The correlation between FGTAX and BKTSX is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2016

0.93

The correlation between FGTAX and BKTSX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGTAX vs. BKTSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGTAX
FGTAX Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
FGTAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGTAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGTAX Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
FGTAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGTAX Martin Ratio Rank: 8484
Martin Ratio Rank

BKTSX
BKTSX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
BKTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
BKTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGTAX vs. BKTSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) and iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGTAXBKTSXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.44

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.53

3.34

+0.19

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.97

15.37

+0.60

FGTAX vs. BKTSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGTAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the BKTSX Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGTAX and BKTSX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGTAXBKTSXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.67

2.44

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

0.76

+0.20

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.90

0.82

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.59

0.83

-0.24

Drawdowns

FGTAX vs. BKTSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGTAX drawdown since its inception was -53.07%, which is greater than BKTSX's maximum drawdown of -34.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGTAX and BKTSX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGTAXBKTSXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-53.07%

-34.97%

-18.10%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.04%

-8.87%

-0.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.52%

-19.29%

+0.77%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.48%

-24.98%

+1.50%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.21%

-34.97%

-0.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.32%

0.00%

-0.32%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.78%

-4.53%

-2.25%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.99%

1.93%

+0.06%

Volatility

FGTAX vs. BKTSX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A (FGTAX) is 2.71%, while iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) has a volatility of 2.94%. This indicates that FGTAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BKTSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGTAXBKTSXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.71%

2.94%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.04%

9.13%

-0.09%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.97%

12.15%

-0.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.68%

17.36%

-0.68%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

18.41%

-0.30%

FGTAX vs. BKTSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGTAX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than BKTSX's 0.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGTAX vs. BKTSX - Dividend Comparison

FGTAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.37%, more than BKTSX's 1.04% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
1.04%1.14%1.27%1.46%1.64%1.58%1.51%2.15%2.49%2.17%1.54%0.00%
FGTAX
Fidelity Advisor Mega Cap Stock Fund Class A
3.37%3.72%2.48%1.86%4.17%4.61%7.84%12.91%21.65%16.21%1.75%3.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, FGTAX and BKTSX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

BKTSX has higher volatility (2.94%) compared to FGTAX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGTAX dropped -53.07% vs BKTSX's -34.97%.

FGTAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 2.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGTAX and BKTSX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer