BKTSX vs. FGCKX
Compare and contrast key facts about iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) and Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX).
BKTSX is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the Russell 3000 Index. It was launched on Aug 13, 2015. FGCKX is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on May 15, 2008.
Performance
BKTSX vs. FGCKX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
BKTSX vs. FGCKX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKTSX iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K | -6.70% | 17.15% | 23.83% | 26.02% | -19.05% | 25.56% | 20.82% | 31.12% | -5.37% | 21.02% |
FGCKX Fidelity Growth Company K | -6.85% | 18.67% | 37.30% | 47.35% | -33.82% | 22.62% | 67.61% | 38.50% | -4.07% | 36.89% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BKTSX having a -6.70% return and FGCKX slightly lower at -6.85%. Over the past 10 years, BKTSX has underperformed FGCKX with an annualized return of 13.31%, while FGCKX has yielded a comparatively higher 19.90% annualized return.
BKTSX
- 1D
- -0.45%
- 1M
- -7.71%
- YTD
- -6.70%
- 6M
- -4.47%
- 1Y
- 14.73%
- 3Y*
- 16.75%
- 5Y*
- 10.27%
- 10Y*
- 13.31%
FGCKX
- 1D
- -1.23%
- 1M
- -8.22%
- YTD
- -6.85%
- 6M
- -6.85%
- 1Y
- 26.45%
- 3Y*
- 24.22%
- 5Y*
- 12.12%
- 10Y*
- 19.90%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
BKTSX vs. FGCKX - Expense Ratio Comparison
BKTSX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than FGCKX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
BKTSX vs. FGCKX — Risk / Return Rank
BKTSX
FGCKX
BKTSX vs. FGCKX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) and Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BKTSX | FGCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.83 | 1.07 | -0.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.29 | 1.59 | -0.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.20 | 1.23 | -0.03 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.05 | 1.49 | -0.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.09 | 5.54 | -0.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BKTSX | FGCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.83 | 1.07 | -0.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.60 | 0.51 | +0.09 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.73 | 0.86 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.73 | 0.65 | +0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between BKTSX and FGCKX is 0.88, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
BKTSX vs. FGCKX - Dividend Comparison
BKTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.22%, while FGCKX has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BKTSX iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K | 1.22% | 1.14% | 1.27% | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.58% | 1.51% | 2.15% | 2.49% | 2.17% | 1.54% | 0.00% |
FGCKX Fidelity Growth Company K | 0.00% | 0.00% | 8.80% | 3.81% | 7.16% | 10.63% | 8.83% | 3.84% | 6.38% | 4.73% | 6.20% | 3.96% |
Drawdowns
BKTSX vs. FGCKX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BKTSX drawdown since its inception was -34.97%, smaller than the maximum FGCKX drawdown of -51.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKTSX and FGCKX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| BKTSX | FGCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -34.97% | -51.01% | +16.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.36% | -13.09% | +0.73% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.98% | -40.21% | +15.23% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -34.97% | -40.21% | +5.24% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.87% | -12.55% | +3.68% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.59% | -9.03% | +4.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 3.88% | -1.33% |
Volatility
BKTSX vs. FGCKX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) is 4.37%, while Fidelity Growth Company K (FGCKX) has a volatility of 6.73%. This indicates that BKTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGCKX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| BKTSX | FGCKX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.37% | 6.73% | -2.36% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.28% | 14.66% | -5.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.38% | 24.33% | -5.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.33% | 23.99% | -6.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.38% | 23.34% | -4.96% |