PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
BKTSX vs. VTSNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

BKTSX vs. VTSNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTSNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BKTSX achieves a 9.74% return, which is significantly lower than VTSNX's 12.79% return. Over the past 10 years, BKTSX has outperformed VTSNX with an annualized return of 14.50%, while VTSNX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.42% annualized return.


BKTSX

1D
1.62%
1M
-0.77%
6M
8.04%
YTD
9.74%
1Y
20.92%
3Y*
18.58%
5Y*
11.73%
10Y*
14.50%
ALL TIME*
14.67%

VTSNX

1D
2.75%
1M
0.11%
6M
6.67%
YTD
12.79%
1Y
27.72%
3Y*
16.82%
5Y*
8.84%
10Y*
9.42%
ALL TIME*
6.63%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

BKTSX vs. VTSNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
9.74%17.15%23.83%26.02%-19.05%25.56%20.82%31.12%-5.37%21.02%
VTSNX
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares
12.79%32.24%5.38%15.29%-15.99%8.64%11.27%21.69%-14.41%27.54%

Correlation

The correlation between BKTSX and VTSNX is 0.84, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.84

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.78

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.79

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 4, 2016

0.79

The correlation between BKTSX and VTSNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.77 to 0.84 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

BKTSX vs. VTSNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

BKTSX
BKTSX Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
BKTSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BKTSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
BKTSX Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
BKTSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BKTSX Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank

VTSNX
VTSNX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
VTSNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VTSNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
VTSNX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
VTSNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
VTSNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

BKTSX vs. VTSNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) and Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTSNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


BKTSXVTSNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.23

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.31

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.09

2.33

-0.24

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.05

8.66

+0.40

BKTSX vs. VTSNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current BKTSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the VTSNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BKTSX and VTSNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

BKTSX vs. VTSNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BKTSX drawdown since its inception was -34.97%, roughly equal to the maximum VTSNX drawdown of -35.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BKTSX and VTSNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


BKTSXVTSNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-34.97%

-35.72%

+0.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.87%

-11.29%

+2.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.29%

-13.14%

-6.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.98%

-29.50%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.97%

-35.72%

+0.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.78%

-2.62%

+0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.48%

-8.04%

+3.56%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.05%

3.03%

-0.98%

Volatility

BKTSX vs. VTSNX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K (BKTSX) is 3.40%, while Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares (VTSNX) has a volatility of 5.43%. This indicates that BKTSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VTSNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


BKTSXVTSNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.40%

5.43%

-2.03%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

14.12%

-3.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.05%

15.98%

-2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.47%

15.36%

+2.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

15.83%

+2.58%

BKTSX vs. VTSNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

BKTSX has a 0.02% expense ratio, which is lower than VTSNX's 0.08% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

BKTSX vs. VTSNX - Dividend Comparison

BKTSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than VTSNX's 2.58% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BKTSX
iShares Total U.S. Stock Market Index Fund Class K
1.08%1.14%1.27%1.46%1.64%1.58%1.51%2.15%2.49%2.17%1.54%0.00%
VTSNX
Vanguard Total International Stock Index Fund Institutional Shares
2.58%3.17%3.36%3.24%3.08%3.08%2.13%3.16%3.19%2.75%2.95%2.86%

Frequently Asked Questions


BKTSX and VTSNX have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VTSNX has higher volatility (5.43%) compared to BKTSX (3.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BKTSX dropped -34.97% vs VTSNX's -35.72%.

VTSNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for BKTSX and VTSNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer