FGSKX vs. VMFGX

Last updated Aug 1, 2026

FGSKX (Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6) and VMFGX (Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares) are both Mid Cap Growth Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FGSKX returned 14.83%/yr vs 10.90%/yr for VMFGX. Their correlation of 0.84 means they have usually moved in the same direction. FGSKX charges 0.84%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for VMFGX.

Performance

FGSKX vs. VMFGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGSKX achieves a -0.65% return, which is significantly lower than VMFGX's 15.95% return. Over the past 10 years, FGSKX has outperformed VMFGX with an annualized return of 14.83%, while VMFGX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.90% annualized return.

FGSKX

• 1D: 2.57%
• 1M: -1.51%
• 6M: 0.27%
• YTD: -0.65%
• 1Y: -1.59%
• 3Y*: 15.86%
• 5Y*: 8.20%
• 10Y*: 14.83%
• ALL TIME*: 9.81%

VMFGX

• 1D: 1.50%
• 1M: -2.71%
• 6M: 11.51%
• YTD: 15.95%
• 1Y: 22.97%
• 3Y*: 13.93%
• 5Y*: 7.56%
• 10Y*: 10.90%
• ALL TIME*: 12.08%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGSKX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FGSKX vs. VMFGX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGSKX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6	-0.65%	10.90%	33.36%	27.45%	-24.38%	22.74%	35.92%	28.35%	-3.00%	24.68%
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	15.95%	7.43%	15.86%	17.42%	-18.99%	18.83%	22.61%	26.20%	-10.39%	19.87%

Correlation

The correlation between FGSKX and VMFGX is 0.31, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.31
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.54
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.73
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.80
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2012	0.84

Over the past year, the correlation between FGSKX and VMFGX has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.84, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Return for Risk

FGSKX vs. VMFGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGSKX

FGSKX Risk / Return Rank: 4
FGSKX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
FGSKX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
FGSKX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
FGSKX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
FGSKX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

VMFGX

VMFGX Risk / Return Rank: 45
VMFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
VMFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 39
VMFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
VMFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
VMFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 56

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGSKX vs. VMFGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) and Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGSKX	VMFGX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.06	1.12	-1.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.05	1.69	-1.64
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.01	1.20	-0.19
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.07	2.00	-2.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.18	7.41	-7.59

FGSKX vs. VMFGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGSKX Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the VMFGX Sharpe Ratio of 1.12. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGSKX and VMFGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGSKX vs. VMFGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGSKX drawdown since its inception was -55.05%, which is greater than VMFGX's maximum drawdown of -39.15%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGSKX and VMFGX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGSKX	VMFGX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.05%	-39.15%	-15.90%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.01%	-9.91%	-4.10%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.47%	-25.45%	+0.98%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-35.68%	-29.25%	-6.43%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-37.16%	-39.15%	+1.99%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.62%	-4.61%	-1.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-10.81%	-5.67%	-5.14%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.53%	2.69%	+2.84%

Volatility

FGSKX vs. VMFGX - Volatility Comparison

Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6 (FGSKX) has a higher volatility of 4.98% compared to Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares (VMFGX) at 4.55%. This indicates that FGSKX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VMFGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGSKX	VMFGX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	4.55%	+0.43%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.48%	13.97%	-0.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.00%	17.70%	+0.30%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.55%	20.71%	+1.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.34%	21.07%	+1.27%

FGSKX vs. VMFGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGSKX has a 0.84% expense ratio, which is higher than VMFGX's 0.08% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGSKX vs. VMFGX - Dividend Comparison

FGSKX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.40%, more than VMFGX's 0.61% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGSKX Federated Hermes MDT Mid Cap Growth Fund Class R6	5.40%	5.37%	4.70%	0.00%	2.52%	28.15%	7.60%	8.72%	15.47%	14.82%	0.89%	26.74%
VMFGX Vanguard S&P Mid-Cap 400 Growth Index Fund Institutional Shares	0.61%	0.70%	0.84%	1.21%	1.12%	0.53%	0.79%	1.22%	1.18%	0.93%	1.14%	1.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGSKX and VMFGX in my portfolio?

FGSKX and VMFGX have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGSKX or VMFGX?

FGSKX has higher volatility (4.98%) compared to VMFGX (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGSKX dropped -55.05% vs VMFGX's -39.15%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

VMFGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.12 vs -0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.