FGRO vs. CMGG.TO

Last updated Apr 3, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF (FGRO) and CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO).

FGRO and CMGG.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FGRO is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Feb 2, 2021. CMGG.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management. It was launched on Jan 12, 2021.

Performance

FGRO vs. CMGG.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF (FGRO) and CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FGRO vs. CMGG.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FGRO Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF	-5.49%	19.61%	32.29%	49.71%	-37.86%	1.72%
CMGG.TO CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund	-1.39%	26.80%	40.87%	27.04%	-26.44%	12.10%

Different Trading Currencies

FGRO is traded in USD, while CMGG.TO is traded in CAD. To make them comparable, the CMGG.TO values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGRO achieves a -5.74% return, which is significantly lower than CMGG.TO's -1.39% return.

FGRO

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: -4.23%
• YTD: -5.74%
• 6M: -4.38%
• 1Y: 26.46%
• 3Y*: 24.30%
• 5Y*: 8.29%
• 10Y*: —

CMGG.TO

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.21%
• YTD: -1.39%
• 6M: -1.75%
• 1Y: 31.90%
• 3Y*: 27.53%
• 5Y*: 12.82%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGRO vs. CMGG.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGRO has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than CMGG.TO's 0.90% expense ratio.

CMGG.TO

CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund

FGRO

Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF

Return for Risk

FGRO vs. CMGG.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMGG.TO

CMGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 73
CMGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 75
CMGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 76
CMGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 71
CMGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
CMGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGRO vs. CMGG.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF (FGRO) and CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGRO	CMGG.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.06	1.60	-0.54
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.61	2.27	-0.66
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.32	-0.09
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	3.16	-1.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.85	9.85	-3.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGRO vs. CMGG.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGRO Sharpe Ratio is 1.06, which is lower than the CMGG.TO Sharpe Ratio of 1.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGRO and CMGG.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGRO	CMGG.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.06	1.60	-0.54
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.33	0.65	-0.32
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.27	0.62	-0.34

Correlation

The correlation between FGRO and CMGG.TO is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FGRO vs. CMGG.TO - Dividend Comparison

Neither FGRO nor CMGG.TO has paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
FGRO Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF	0.16%	0.14%	0.09%	0.00%	1.50%	0.55%
CMGG.TO CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FGRO vs. CMGG.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGRO drawdown since its inception was -44.52%, which is greater than CMGG.TO's maximum drawdown of -33.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGRO and CMGG.TO.

Volatility

FGRO vs. CMGG.TO - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Opportunities ETF (FGRO) has a higher volatility of 8.55% compared to CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) at 7.17%. This indicates that FGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CMGG.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGRO	CMGG.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.55%	7.17%	+1.38%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.90%	12.71%	+2.19%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.19%	20.06%	+5.13%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.39%	19.85%	+5.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.59%	20.18%	+5.41%