CMGG.TO vs. SPMO
Compare and contrast key facts about CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO).
CMGG.TO and SPMO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CMGG.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management. It was launched on Jan 12, 2021. SPMO is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Momentum Index. It was launched on Oct 9, 2015.
Performance
CMGG.TO vs. SPMO - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMGG.TO vs. SPMO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGG.TO CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund | -1.82% | 21.00% | 52.95% | 24.21% | -21.16% | 11.08% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | -4.50% | 20.78% | 58.34% | 14.97% | -4.07% | 22.46% |
Different Trading Currencies
CMGG.TO is traded in CAD, while SPMO is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the SPMO values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMGG.TO achieves a -1.82% return, which is significantly higher than SPMO's -8.06% return.
CMGG.TO
- 1D
- 3.55%
- 1M
- -3.38%
- YTD
- -1.82%
- 6M
- -2.30%
- 1Y
- 27.32%
- 3Y*
- 28.28%
- 5Y*
- 14.77%
- 10Y*
- —
SPMO
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -7.61%
- YTD
- -8.06%
- 6M
- -10.45%
- 1Y
- 13.76%
- 3Y*
- 27.96%
- 5Y*
- 18.70%
- 10Y*
- 17.50%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMGG.TO vs. SPMO - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGG.TO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than SPMO's 0.13% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMGG.TO vs. SPMO — Risk / Return Rank
CMGG.TO
SPMO
CMGG.TO vs. SPMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) and Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMGG.TO | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.41 | 0.63 | +0.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.96 | 1.00 | +0.97 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.15 | +0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.66 | 1.15 | +1.51 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.08 | 3.44 | +3.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMGG.TO | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.41 | 0.63 | +0.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.82 | 1.08 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.93 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.76 | 0.91 | -0.15 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGG.TO and SPMO is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
CMGG.TO vs. SPMO - Dividend Comparison
CMGG.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPMO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.91%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGG.TO CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPMO Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF | 0.91% | 0.73% | 0.48% | 1.63% | 1.66% | 0.52% | 1.27% | 1.39% | 1.05% | 0.77% | 1.94% | 0.36% |
Drawdowns
CMGG.TO vs. SPMO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.00%, which is greater than SPMO's maximum drawdown of -25.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG.TO and SPMO.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGG.TO | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.00% | -30.95% | +1.95% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -12.70% | +2.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | -22.74% | -6.26% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -30.95% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.96% | -9.24% | +2.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -4.66% | -4.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.81% | 3.57% | +0.24% |
Volatility
CMGG.TO vs. SPMO - Volatility Comparison
CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Momentum ETF (SPMO) at 5.16%. This indicates that CMGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMGG.TO | SPMO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.09% | 5.16% | +1.93% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.12% | 11.73% | +0.39% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.52% | 22.03% | -2.51% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.14% | 17.37% | +0.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.40% | 18.89% | -0.49% |