PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMGG.TO vs. ARKK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMGG.TO vs. ARKK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CMGG.TO is traded in CAD, while ARKK is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARKK values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMGG.TO achieves a 21.24% return, which is significantly higher than ARKK's 2.91% return.


CMGG.TO

1D
0.12%
1M
10.96%
YTD
21.24%
6M
21.36%
1Y
38.88%
3Y*
35.34%
5Y*
20.56%
10Y*

ARKK

1D
-1.79%
1M
1.91%
YTD
2.91%
6M
-3.58%
1Y
36.64%
3Y*
25.16%
5Y*
-3.59%
10Y*
16.59%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMGG.TO vs. ARKK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CMGG.TO
CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund
21.24%21.00%52.95%24.21%-21.16%11.08%
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
2.91%29.28%17.71%65.31%-64.62%-32.91%

Correlation

The correlation between CMGG.TO and ARKK is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.55

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2021

0.38

The correlation between CMGG.TO and ARKK shifts across timeframes, from 0.38 (all time) to 0.55 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMGG.TO vs. ARKK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMGG.TO
CMGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
CMGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6868
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
CMGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank

ARKK
ARKK Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
ARKK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ARKK Sortino Ratio Rank: 2727
Sortino Ratio Rank
ARKK Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ARKK Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ARKK Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMGG.TO vs. ARKK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) and ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMGG.TOARKKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.33

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.55

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.40

1.18

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.85

1.17

+2.68

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.77

2.48

+8.29

CMGG.TO vs. ARKK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is higher than the ARKK Sharpe Ratio of 1.03. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMGG.TO and ARKK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMGG.TOARKKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

1.03

+1.33

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.14

-0.08

+1.22

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.43

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.42

+0.56

Drawdowns

CMGG.TO vs. ARKK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.00%, smaller than the maximum ARKK drawdown of -79.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG.TO and ARKK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMGG.TOARKKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.00%

-79.62%

+50.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-31.49%

+21.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.85%

-39.19%

+16.34%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

-75.05%

+46.05%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-44.57%

+44.57%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.91%

-29.14%

+20.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.62%

14.81%

-11.19%

Volatility

CMGG.TO vs. ARKK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) is 6.68%, while ARK Innovation ETF (ARKK) has a volatility of 9.28%. This indicates that CMGG.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ARKK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMGG.TOARKKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.68%

9.28%

-2.60%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.94%

24.49%

-11.55%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.53%

35.65%

-19.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.22%

44.52%

-26.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.49%

38.60%

-20.11%

CMGG.TO vs. ARKK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMGG.TO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than ARKK's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMGG.TO vs. ARKK - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMGG.TO nor ARKK has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ARKK
ARK Innovation ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.70%0.00%0.55%1.64%0.38%3.14%1.32%0.00%2.27%
CMGG.TO
CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMGG.TO and ARKK have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ARKK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ARKK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for CMGG.TO.

CMGG.TO is categorized as Global Equities, while ARKK is Technology Equities. They also come from different issuers: CI Global Asset Management and ARK. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CMGG.TO and 0.75% for ARKK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMGG.TO and ARKK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer