PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMGG.TO vs. GRNY
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
CMGG.TO
CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund
-0.22%21.00%3.49%
GRNY
Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF
-2.29%18.36%2.63%
Different Trading Currencies

CMGG.TO is traded in CAD, while GRNY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GRNY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMGG.TO achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly higher than GRNY's -2.29% return.


CMGG.TO

1D
1.62%
1M
-1.93%
YTD
-0.22%
6M
-1.50%
1Y
28.64%
3Y*
28.97%
5Y*
15.14%
10Y*

GRNY

1D
0.00%
1M
-3.27%
YTD
-2.29%
6M
-5.32%
1Y
26.21%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMGG.TO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GRNY's 0.75% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CMGG.TO vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMGG.TO
CMGG.TO Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
CMGG.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7777
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CMGG.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
CMGG.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
CMGG.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
CMGG.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

GRNY
GRNY Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
GRNY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GRNY Sortino Ratio Rank: 7272
Sortino Ratio Rank
GRNY Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
GRNY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
GRNY Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CMGG.TOGRNYDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.47

1.09

+0.37

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.04

1.61

+0.44

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.22

+0.06

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.05

+0.85

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.67

5.55

+2.13

CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CMGG.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.47, which is higher than the GRNY Sharpe Ratio of 1.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CMGG.TO and GRNY, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CMGG.TOGRNYDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.47

1.09

+0.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.57

+0.21

Correlation

The correlation between CMGG.TO and GRNY is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison

Neither CMGG.TO nor GRNY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.00%, which is greater than GRNY's maximum drawdown of -24.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG.TO and GRNY.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CMGG.TOGRNYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.00%

-24.18%

-4.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.15%

-13.36%

+3.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.00%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.45%

-8.39%

+2.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.17%

-4.33%

-4.84%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.83%

4.08%

-0.25%

Volatility

CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison

CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) at 6.14%. This indicates that CMGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CMGG.TOGRNYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.94%

6.14%

+0.80%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.22%

14.11%

-1.89%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.58%

24.06%

-4.48%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.13%

23.38%

-5.25%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.41%

23.38%

-4.97%