CMGG.TO vs. GRNY
Compare and contrast key facts about CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY).
CMGG.TO and GRNY are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CMGG.TO is an actively managed fund by CI Global Asset Management. It was launched on Jan 12, 2021. GRNY is an actively managed fund by Tidal ETFs. It was launched on Nov 7, 2024.
Performance
CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
CMGG.TO CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund | -0.22% | 21.00% | 3.49% |
GRNY Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF | -2.29% | 18.36% | 2.63% |
Different Trading Currencies
CMGG.TO is traded in CAD, while GRNY is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GRNY values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMGG.TO achieves a -0.22% return, which is significantly higher than GRNY's -2.29% return.
CMGG.TO
- 1D
- 1.62%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- YTD
- -0.22%
- 6M
- -1.50%
- 1Y
- 28.64%
- 3Y*
- 28.97%
- 5Y*
- 15.14%
- 10Y*
- —
GRNY
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -3.27%
- YTD
- -2.29%
- 6M
- -5.32%
- 1Y
- 26.21%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGG.TO has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than GRNY's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMGG.TO vs. GRNY — Risk / Return Rank
CMGG.TO
GRNY
CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) and Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMGG.TO | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.47 | 1.09 | +0.37 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.04 | 1.61 | +0.44 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.28 | 1.22 | +0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.90 | 2.05 | +0.85 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.67 | 5.55 | +2.13 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMGG.TO | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.47 | 1.09 | +0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.84 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.78 | 0.57 | +0.21 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGG.TO and GRNY is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Dividend Comparison
Neither CMGG.TO nor GRNY has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGG.TO drawdown since its inception was -29.00%, which is greater than GRNY's maximum drawdown of -24.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGG.TO and GRNY.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGG.TO | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.00% | -24.18% | -4.82% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.15% | -13.36% | +3.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -29.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.45% | -8.39% | +2.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -4.33% | -4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.83% | 4.08% | -0.25% |
Volatility
CMGG.TO vs. GRNY - Volatility Comparison
CI Munro Global Growth Equity Fund (CMGG.TO) has a higher volatility of 6.94% compared to Fundstrat Granny Shots US Large Cap ETF (GRNY) at 6.14%. This indicates that CMGG.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GRNY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMGG.TO | GRNY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.94% | 6.14% | +0.80% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.22% | 14.11% | -1.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.58% | 24.06% | -4.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.13% | 23.38% | -5.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.41% | 23.38% | -4.97% |