FGR.PA vs. UNP
FGR.PA (Eiffage SA) and UNP (Union Pacific Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Industrials sector — FGR.PA in Engineering & Construction, UNP in Railroads. Over the past 10 years, FGR.PA returned 9.40%/yr vs 14.18%/yr for UNP. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FGR.PA vs. UNP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FGR.PA is traded in EUR, while UNP is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UNP values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGR.PA achieves a 2.93% return, which is significantly lower than UNP's 28.97% return. Over the past 10 years, FGR.PA has underperformed UNP with an annualized return of 9.40%, while UNP has yielded a comparatively higher 14.18% annualized return.
FGR.PA
- 1D
- 0.17%
- 1M
- -2.22%
- 6M
- 0.30%
- YTD
- 2.93%
- 1Y
- 7.45%
- 3Y*
- 13.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.89%
- 10Y*
- 9.40%
UNP
- 1D
- 0.80%
- 1M
- 8.47%
- 6M
- 29.37%
- YTD
- 28.97%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- 12.69%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- 14.18%
FGR.PA vs. UNP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGR.PA Eiffage SA | 2.93% | 50.01% | -9.11% | 9.25% | 5.05% | 18.20% | -22.51% | 43.56% | -18.50% | 40.56% |
UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 28.97% | -8.47% | 1.16% | 17.96% | -10.72% | 32.54% | 7.94% | 36.72% | 10.20% | 16.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGR.PA and UNP is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.21 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 9, 2007 | 0.23 |
The correlation between FGR.PA and UNP shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (3 years) to 0.23 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGR.PA vs. UNP — Risk / Return Rank
FGR.PA
UNP
FGR.PA vs. UNP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) and Union Pacific Corporation (UNP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGR.PA | UNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.07 | 1.23 | -0.16 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.43 | 2.29 | -1.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.83 | 5.75 | -4.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGR.PA vs. UNP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGR.PA drawdown since its inception was -85.98%, which is greater than UNP's maximum drawdown of -52.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGR.PA and UNP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGR.PA | UNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -85.98% | -52.65% | -33.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.11% | -11.81% | -5.30% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.41% | -23.57% | +3.16% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.78% | -30.08% | +9.30% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -53.28% | -37.71% | -15.57% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.92% | 0.00% | -13.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -35.14% | -10.51% | -24.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.87% | 4.84% | +4.03% |
Volatility
FGR.PA vs. UNP - Volatility Comparison
Eiffage SA (FGR.PA) has a higher volatility of 7.39% compared to Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) at 6.32%. This indicates that FGR.PA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UNP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGR.PA | UNP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.39% | 6.32% | +1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.78% | 18.03% | +0.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.53% | 22.64% | +1.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 22.72% | 23.01% | -0.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.70% | 26.01% | -0.31% |
Dividends
FGR.PA vs. UNP - Dividend Comparison
FGR.PA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.96%, more than UNP's 1.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGR.PA Eiffage SA | 3.96% | 3.84% | 4.84% | 3.71% | 3.37% | 3.32% | 0.00% | 2.35% | 2.74% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 2.02% |
UNP Union Pacific Corporation | 1.92% | 2.35% | 2.32% | 2.12% | 2.45% | 1.70% | 1.86% | 2.05% | 2.21% | 1.85% | 2.17% | 2.81% |
Financials
FGR.PA vs. UNP - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Eiffage SA and Union Pacific Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
FGR.PA and UNP have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FGR.PA and UNP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer