PortfoliosLab logo
UNP vs. NSC
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between UNP and NSC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

UNP vs. NSC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) and Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UNP:

-0.02

NSC:

0.50

Sortino Ratio

UNP:

0.15

NSC:

0.96

Omega Ratio

UNP:

1.02

NSC:

1.11

Calmar Ratio

UNP:

-0.02

NSC:

0.53

Martin Ratio

UNP:

-0.06

NSC:

1.32

Ulcer Index

UNP:

7.41%

NSC:

10.20%

Daily Std Dev

UNP:

23.64%

NSC:

29.31%

Max Drawdown

UNP:

-67.49%

NSC:

-67.74%

Current Drawdown

UNP:

-13.57%

NSC:

-10.19%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UNP:

$132.94B

NSC:

$55.53B

EPS

UNP:

$11.13

NSC:

$14.88

PE Ratio

UNP:

19.99

NSC:

16.55

PEG Ratio

UNP:

2.80

NSC:

2.29

PS Ratio

UNP:

5.48

NSC:

4.58

PB Ratio

UNP:

8.28

NSC:

3.77

Total Revenue (TTM)

UNP:

$24.25B

NSC:

$12.11B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UNP:

$11.03B

NSC:

$4.73B

EBITDA (TTM)

UNP:

$12.48B

NSC:

$6.47B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UNP achieves a -1.67% return, which is significantly lower than NSC's 6.51% return. Over the past 10 years, UNP has underperformed NSC with an annualized return of 10.57%, while NSC has yielded a comparatively higher 12.71% annualized return.


UNP

YTD

-1.67%

1M

3.40%

6M

-7.82%

1Y

-0.53%

3Y*

2.65%

5Y*

7.80%

10Y*

10.57%

NSC

YTD

6.51%

1M

10.97%

6M

-9.38%

1Y

14.52%

3Y*

3.40%

5Y*

8.98%

10Y*

12.71%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Union Pacific Corporation

Norfolk Southern Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UNP vs. NSC — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UNP
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UNP is 4545
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UNP is 4848
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UNP is 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UNP is 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UNP is 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UNP is 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

NSC
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NSC is 6666
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NSC is 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NSC is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NSC is 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NSC is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NSC is 6666
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UNP vs. NSC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) and Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current UNP Sharpe Ratio is -0.02, which is lower than the NSC Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UNP and NSC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

UNP vs. NSC - Dividend Comparison

UNP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.00%, more than NSC's 2.19% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UNP
Union Pacific Corporation
3.00%2.32%2.12%2.45%1.70%1.86%2.05%2.21%1.85%2.17%2.81%1.60%
NSC
Norfolk Southern Corporation
2.19%2.30%2.28%2.01%1.40%1.58%1.85%2.03%1.68%2.18%2.79%2.03%

Drawdowns

UNP vs. NSC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UNP drawdown since its inception was -67.49%, roughly equal to the maximum NSC drawdown of -67.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UNP and NSC.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

UNP vs. NSC - Volatility Comparison

Union Pacific Corporation (UNP) and Norfolk Southern Corporation (NSC) have volatilities of 8.03% and 8.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

UNP vs. NSC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Union Pacific Corporation and Norfolk Southern Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


2.00B3.00B4.00B5.00B6.00B7.00B20212022202320242025
6.03B
2.99B
(UNP) Total Revenue
(NSC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UNP vs. NSC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Union Pacific Corporation and Norfolk Southern Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%70.0%20212022202320242025
45.3%
41.8%
(UNP) Gross Margin
(NSC) Gross Margin
UNP - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Union Pacific Corporation reported a gross profit of 2.73B and revenue of 6.03B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 45.3%.

NSC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.25B and revenue of 2.99B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 41.8%.

UNP - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Union Pacific Corporation reported an operating income of 2.37B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in an operating margin of 39.3%.

NSC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported an operating income of 1.15B and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in an operating margin of 38.3%.

UNP - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Union Pacific Corporation reported a net income of 1.63B and revenue of 6.03B, resulting in a net margin of 27.0%.

NSC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Norfolk Southern Corporation reported a net income of 750.00M and revenue of 2.99B, resulting in a net margin of 25.1%.