FGM vs. NORW

Last updated Aug 5, 2026

FGM (First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund) and NORW (Global X MSCI Norway ETF) are both Europe Equities funds - FGM tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index while NORW tracks the MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGM returned 8.22%/yr vs 10.03%/yr for NORW. Their 0.63 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FGM charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.50%/yr for NORW.

Performance

FGM vs. NORW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGM achieves a 4.28% return, which is significantly lower than NORW's 24.70% return. Over the past 10 years, FGM has underperformed NORW with an annualized return of 8.22%, while NORW has yielded a comparatively higher 10.03% annualized return.

FGM

• 1D: 0.67%
• 1M: -0.96%
• 6M: -4.27%
• YTD: 4.28%
• 1Y: 17.05%
• 3Y*: 20.57%
• 5Y*: 4.93%
• 10Y*: 8.22%
• ALL TIME*: 7.41%

NORW

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 8.26%
• 6M: 13.70%
• YTD: 24.70%
• 1Y: 32.55%
• 3Y*: 18.95%
• 5Y*: 6.74%
• 10Y*: 10.03%
• ALL TIME*: 8.91%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund	$71.07K	$80.31K	$242.50K
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF	$1.53M	$1.47M	$2.79M

FGM vs. NORW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund	4.28%	63.60%	1.36%	13.28%	-30.46%	6.10%	17.26%	20.77%	-25.14%	44.28%
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF	24.70%	32.59%	-2.50%	5.03%	-12.55%	13.65%	26.00%	14.39%	-10.39%	24.03%

Correlation

The correlation between FGM and NORW is 0.33, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.33
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.46
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.51
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2012	0.63

Over the past year, the correlation between FGM and NORW has dropped to 0.33 - well below their long-term average of 0.63, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

FGM vs. NORW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FGM	NORW
Industrials	40.9%	14.8%
Consumer Cyclical	15.6%	0.6%
Real Estate	10.0%	0.4%
Financial Services	9.1%	23.8%
Basic Materials	8.4%	9.5%
Healthcare	7.8%	-
Utilities	2.9%	0.7%
Communication Services	2.8%	6.5%
Consumer Defensive	2.6%	11.7%
Energy	-	28.3%
Technology	-	3.7%

Return for Risk

FGM vs. NORW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGM

FGM Risk / Return Rank: 29
FGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
FGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 30
FGM Omega Ratio Rank: 30
FGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 28
FGM Martin Ratio Rank: 28

NORW

NORW Risk / Return Rank: 64
NORW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
NORW Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
NORW Omega Ratio Rank: 66
NORW Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
NORW Martin Ratio Rank: 53

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGM vs. NORW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) and Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGM	NORW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.82	1.89	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.25	2.65	-1.40
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.15	1.32	-0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.96	2.26	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.59	7.03	-4.43

FGM vs. NORW - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGM Sharpe Ratio is 0.82, which is lower than the NORW Sharpe Ratio of 1.89. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGM and NORW, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGM vs. NORW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGM drawdown since its inception was -51.58%, which is greater than NORW's maximum drawdown of -35.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGM and NORW.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGM	NORW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-51.58%	-35.62%	-15.96%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.76%	-14.49%	-3.27%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-17.76%	-16.06%	-1.70%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-50.18%	-32.78%	-17.40%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-51.58%	-33.86%	-17.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.30%	-4.77%	-2.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-14.66%	-10.11%	-4.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.59%	4.64%	+1.95%

Volatility

FGM vs. NORW - Volatility Comparison

First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) has a higher volatility of 5.40% compared to Global X MSCI Norway ETF (NORW) at 4.79%. This indicates that FGM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NORW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGM	NORW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.40%	4.79%	+0.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.98%	14.00%	+3.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.98%	17.34%	+3.64%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.64%	22.01%	+2.63%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.91%	20.56%	+2.35%

FGM vs. NORW - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGM has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than NORW's 0.50% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGM vs. NORW - Dividend Comparison

FGM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.37%, less than NORW's 7.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund	1.37%	0.66%	2.56%	2.82%	5.44%	1.43%	1.33%	2.30%	2.18%	2.11%	1.33%	1.13%
NORW Global X MSCI Norway ETF	7.22%	3.44%	6.02%	5.27%	4.01%	1.51%	1.13%	2.47%	3.53%	3.64%	3.79%	2.95%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGM and NORW in my portfolio?

FGM and NORW have a correlation of 0.33, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGM or NORW?

FGM has higher volatility (5.40%) compared to NORW (4.79%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGM dropped -51.58% vs NORW's -35.62%.

Which ETF is better, FGM or NORW?

On 10-year performance, NORW leads with 10.03% vs 8.22% for FGM. On fees, NORW is cheaper at 0.50% per year. On volatility, NORW has been the lower-risk option at 4.79%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FGM or NORW?

Over the 10-year period, NORW has performed better with a 10.03% return vs 8.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGM or NORW?

NORW is cheaper with a 0.50% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FGM or NORW?

NORW has the higher dividend yield at 7.22%, compared with 1.37% for FGM.

What is the main difference between FGM and NORW?

FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index, while NORW tracks MSCI Norway IMI 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FGM and 0.50% for NORW.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

NORW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.89 vs 0.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.