PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGKFX vs. HNACX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGKFX vs. HNACX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) and Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Retirement Class (HNACX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGKFX achieves a 24.57% return, which is significantly higher than HNACX's 9.63% return.


FGKFX

1D
-0.09%
1M
7.66%
YTD
24.57%
6M
20.97%
1Y
51.36%
3Y*
32.80%
5Y*
17.78%
10Y*

HNACX

1D
-0.68%
1M
7.51%
YTD
9.63%
6M
8.26%
1Y
21.43%
3Y*
28.99%
5Y*
15.23%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGKFX vs. HNACX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
24.57%21.67%35.46%46.02%-32.62%22.06%68.76%15.07%
HNACX
Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Retirement Class
9.63%14.04%46.43%53.86%-37.67%15.43%54.82%13.43%

Correlation

The correlation between FGKFX and HNACX is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.95

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 14, 2019

0.96

The correlation between FGKFX and HNACX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGKFX vs. HNACX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGKFX
FGKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
FGKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
FGKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank

HNACX
HNACX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
HNACX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
HNACX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
HNACX Omega Ratio Rank: 2121
Omega Ratio Rank
HNACX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
HNACX Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGKFX vs. HNACX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) and Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Retirement Class (HNACX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FGKFXHNACXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.49

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.24

+0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.63

1.23

+3.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.56

3.89

+14.68

FGKFX vs. HNACX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGKFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.84, which is higher than the HNACX Sharpe Ratio of 1.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGKFX and HNACX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FGKFXHNACXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.84

1.35

+1.49

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.74

0.59

+0.15

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.98

0.81

+0.17

Drawdowns

FGKFX vs. HNACX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGKFX drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum HNACX drawdown of -43.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGKFX and HNACX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGKFXHNACXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-43.46%

+3.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-17.94%

+6.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-27.32%

-0.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.14%

-43.46%

+3.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.09%

-0.68%

+0.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.01%

-9.56%

-0.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.83%

5.67%

-2.84%

Volatility

FGKFX vs. HNACX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) has a higher volatility of 4.49% compared to Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Retirement Class (HNACX) at 3.84%. This indicates that FGKFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HNACX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGKFXHNACXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.49%

3.84%

+0.65%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.29%

12.37%

+1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.59%

16.36%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.13%

25.80%

-1.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.74%

24.88%

+0.86%

FGKFX vs. HNACX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGKFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than HNACX's 0.57% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGKFX vs. HNACX - Dividend Comparison

FGKFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HNACX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.21%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.18%2.64%0.93%0.06%0.00%0.00%
HNACX
Harbor Capital Appreciation Fund Retirement Class
10.21%11.19%21.66%0.00%0.00%18.62%12.25%8.97%11.07%11.64%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FGKFX and HNACX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGKFX has higher volatility (4.49%) compared to HNACX (3.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGKFX dropped -40.14% vs HNACX's -43.46%.

FGKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.84 vs 1.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGKFX and HNACX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer