PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGKFX vs. FDGRX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGKFX vs. FDGRX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FGKFX having a 24.92% return and FDGRX slightly lower at 23.76%.


FGKFX

1D
3.63%
1M
3.91%
YTD
24.92%
6M
22.11%
1Y
50.50%
3Y*
31.45%
5Y*
17.42%
10Y*

FDGRX

1D
3.46%
1M
3.55%
YTD
23.76%
6M
19.87%
1Y
46.67%
3Y*
30.33%
5Y*
16.75%
10Y*
23.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGKFX vs. FDGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
24.92%21.67%35.46%46.02%-32.62%22.06%68.76%15.07%
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
23.76%18.54%37.18%47.25%-33.86%22.57%67.42%16.27%

Correlation

The correlation between FGKFX and FDGRX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.99

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

1.00

The correlation between FGKFX and FDGRX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGKFX vs. FDGRX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGKFX
FGKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8888
Overall Rank
FGKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
FGKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9393
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

FDGRX
FDGRX Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
FDGRX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FDGRX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
FDGRX Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
FDGRX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
FDGRX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGKFX vs. FDGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGKFXFDGRXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.43

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.65

3.89

+0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.08

14.30

+3.77

FGKFX vs. FDGRX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGKFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the FDGRX Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGKFX and FDGRX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGKFX vs. FDGRX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGKFX drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum FDGRX drawdown of -71.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGKFX and FDGRX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGKFXFDGRXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-71.62%

+31.48%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-12.60%

+1.20%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-26.19%

-1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.14%

-40.25%

+0.11%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.98%

-15.90%

+5.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

3.42%

-0.50%

Volatility

FGKFX vs. FDGRX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) and Fidelity Growth Company Fund (FDGRX) have volatilities of 7.65% and 7.44%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGKFXFDGRXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.65%

7.44%

+0.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.73%

15.77%

-0.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.68%

19.46%

+0.22%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.30%

24.08%

+0.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.80%

23.47%

+2.33%

FGKFX vs. FDGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGKFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than FDGRX's 0.52% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGKFX vs. FDGRX - Dividend Comparison

Neither FGKFX nor FDGRX has paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FDGRX
Fidelity Growth Company Fund
0.00%0.00%8.86%3.83%7.20%10.67%8.86%3.84%6.38%4.73%6.16%3.92%
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.18%2.64%0.93%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, FGKFX and FDGRX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGKFX has higher volatility (7.65%) compared to FDGRX (7.44%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGKFX dropped -40.14% vs FDGRX's -71.62%.

FGKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGKFX and FDGRX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer