PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGKFX vs. VUG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGKFX vs. VUG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGKFX achieves a 24.22% return, which is significantly higher than VUG's 5.76% return.


FGKFX

1D
1.86%
1M
2.61%
YTD
24.22%
6M
18.73%
1Y
51.43%
3Y*
31.20%
5Y*
17.09%
10Y*

VUG

1D
-1.24%
1M
-1.87%
YTD
5.76%
6M
5.17%
1Y
24.00%
3Y*
23.62%
5Y*
13.40%
10Y*
18.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGKFX vs. VUG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
24.22%21.67%35.46%46.02%-32.62%22.06%68.76%15.07%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
5.76%19.40%32.69%46.83%-33.16%27.35%40.25%14.46%

Correlation

The correlation between FGKFX and VUG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.92

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.94

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2019

0.96

The correlation between FGKFX and VUG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGKFX vs. VUG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGKFX
FGKFX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
FGKFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGKFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGKFX Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
FGKFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGKFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank

VUG
VUG Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
VUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
VUG Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
VUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VUG Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGKFX vs. VUG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) and Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGKFXVUGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.14

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.43

1.25

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.47

1.46

+3.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.37

4.99

+12.38

FGKFX vs. VUG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGKFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.58, which is higher than the VUG Sharpe Ratio of 1.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGKFX and VUG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGKFX vs. VUG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGKFX drawdown since its inception was -40.14%, smaller than the maximum VUG drawdown of -50.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGKFX and VUG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGKFXVUGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.14%

-50.68%

+10.54%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.40%

-16.53%

+5.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.38%

-22.85%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.14%

-35.61%

-4.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.61%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.56%

-4.86%

+4.30%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.97%

-7.09%

-2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.92%

4.82%

-1.90%

Volatility

FGKFX vs. VUG - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund (FGKFX) has a higher volatility of 7.68% compared to Vanguard Growth ETF (VUG) at 6.55%. This indicates that FGKFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VUG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGKFXVUGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.68%

6.55%

+1.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.72%

13.32%

+2.40%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.76%

16.80%

+2.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.32%

22.36%

+1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.79%

21.53%

+4.26%

FGKFX vs. VUG - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGKFX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than VUG's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

FGKFX vs. VUG - Dividend Comparison

FGKFX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VUG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FGKFX
Fidelity Growth Company K6 Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.10%0.18%2.64%0.93%0.06%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
VUG
Vanguard Growth ETF
0.39%0.41%0.47%0.58%0.70%0.48%0.66%0.95%1.32%1.14%1.39%1.30%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.92, FGKFX and VUG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FGKFX has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to VUG (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGKFX dropped -40.14% vs VUG's -50.68%.

FGKFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.58 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGKFX and VUG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer