FGIAX vs. RGIYX

Last updated Aug 4, 2026

FGIAX (Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A) and RGIYX (Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund) are both Infrastructure Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX returned 8.24%/yr vs 7.96%/yr for RGIYX. Their 0.96 correlation means they have historically moved very closely together. FGIAX charges 1.21%/yr vs 0.85%/yr for RGIYX.

Performance

FGIAX vs. RGIYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 11.78% return, which is significantly higher than RGIYX's 10.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FGIAX having a 8.24% annualized return and RGIYX not far behind at 7.96%.

FGIAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -1.91%
• 6M: 7.25%
• YTD: 11.78%
• 1Y: 15.52%
• 3Y*: 14.42%
• 5Y*: 9.59%
• 10Y*: 8.24%
• ALL TIME*: 6.95%

RGIYX

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: -0.55%
• 6M: 6.28%
• YTD: 10.36%
• 1Y: 15.08%
• 3Y*: 14.18%
• 5Y*: 9.67%
• 10Y*: 7.96%
• ALL TIME*: 8.18%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison

Position	Avg. Volume Value (2W)	Avg. Volume Value (1M)	Avg. Volume Value (3M)
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund	$0.00	$0.00	$0.00

FGIAX vs. RGIYX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	11.78%	17.73%	10.70%	8.51%	-6.23%	14.51%	-2.76%	29.32%	-7.91%	19.40%
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund	10.36%	20.07%	9.96%	6.94%	-2.95%	12.44%	-3.37%	27.98%	-9.87%	18.96%

Correlation

The correlation between FGIAX and RGIYX is 0.96 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.	0.96
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history.	0.96
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.	0.97
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 3, 2011	0.96

The correlation between FGIAX and RGIYX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FGIAX vs. RGIYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

FGIAX

FGIAX Risk / Return Rank: 58
FGIAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
FGIAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
FGIAX Omega Ratio Rank: 49
FGIAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
FGIAX Martin Ratio Rank: 58

RGIYX

RGIYX Risk / Return Rank: 58
RGIYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 54
RGIYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 53
RGIYX Omega Ratio Rank: 50
RGIYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 76
RGIYX Martin Ratio Rank: 54

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

FGIAX vs. RGIYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FGIAX	RGIYX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.50	1.52	-0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.12	2.17	-0.04
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.27	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.65	2.58	+0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.18	7.83	+0.35

FGIAX vs. RGIYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGIAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.50, which is comparable to the RGIYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGIAX and RGIYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FGIAX vs. RGIYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than RGIYX's maximum drawdown of -39.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and RGIYX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGIAX	RGIYX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-49.35%	-39.17%	-10.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-6.04%	-6.00%	-0.04%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-9.68%	-10.80%	+1.12%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-21.08%	-20.19%	-0.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.02%	-39.17%	+1.15%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.72%	-2.09%	-0.63%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.13%	-4.65%	-2.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.95%	1.97%	-0.02%

Volatility

FGIAX vs. RGIYX - Volatility Comparison

Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) has a higher volatility of 3.16% compared to Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund (RGIYX) at 2.71%. This indicates that FGIAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RGIYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGIAX	RGIYX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.16%	2.71%	+0.45%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.06%	8.52%	+0.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	10.69%	10.21%	+0.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.24%	13.52%	-0.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.16%	15.83%	-0.67%

FGIAX vs. RGIYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than RGIYX's 0.85% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGIAX vs. RGIYX - Dividend Comparison

FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.27%, more than RGIYX's 8.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A	14.27%	9.99%	7.46%	2.27%	6.11%	7.20%	1.38%	7.06%	6.32%	5.83%	8.23%	3.05%
RGIYX Russell Investments Global Infrastructure Fund	8.21%	9.39%	5.64%	2.76%	3.46%	17.26%	7.80%	15.89%	9.20%	11.32%	6.70%	5.67%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGIAX and RGIYX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FGIAX and RGIYX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FGIAX or RGIYX?

FGIAX has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to RGIYX (2.71%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGIAX dropped -49.35% vs RGIYX's -39.17%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

RGIYX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs 1.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.