FGIAX vs. GIDGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX).
FGIAX is a passively managed fund by Nuveen that tracks the performance of the S&P Global Infrastructure Index NR. It was launched on Dec 17, 2007. GIDGX is managed by Goldman Sachs. It was launched on Apr 29, 2008.
Performance
FGIAX vs. GIDGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
FGIAX vs. GIDGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 10.36% | 17.73% | 10.70% | 8.51% | -6.23% | 14.51% | -2.76% | 29.32% | -7.91% | 19.40% |
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio | -0.77% | 15.74% | 20.59% | 17.92% | -12.75% | 18.46% | 8.41% | 19.97% | -8.26% | 15.18% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGIAX achieves a 10.36% return, which is significantly higher than GIDGX's -0.77% return. Over the past 10 years, FGIAX has underperformed GIDGX with an annualized return of 8.78%, while GIDGX has yielded a comparatively higher 9.89% annualized return.
FGIAX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -2.77%
- YTD
- 10.36%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- 1Y
- 21.22%
- 3Y*
- 14.32%
- 5Y*
- 10.46%
- 10Y*
- 8.78%
GIDGX
- 1D
- 2.51%
- 1M
- -4.19%
- YTD
- -0.77%
- 6M
- 2.10%
- 1Y
- 16.31%
- 3Y*
- 15.56%
- 5Y*
- 9.42%
- 10Y*
- 9.89%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
FGIAX vs. GIDGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGIAX has a 1.21% expense ratio, which is higher than GIDGX's 0.17% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
FGIAX vs. GIDGX — Risk / Return Rank
FGIAX
GIDGX
FGIAX vs. GIDGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) and Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FGIAX | GIDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.79 | 1.28 | +0.51 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.30 | 1.74 | +0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.36 | 1.28 | +0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.73 | 1.37 | +1.36 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.62 | 6.79 | +5.83 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FGIAX | GIDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.79 | 1.28 | +0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.80 | 0.73 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | 0.70 | -0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.42 | 0.64 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between FGIAX and GIDGX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
FGIAX vs. GIDGX - Dividend Comparison
FGIAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.05%, more than GIDGX's 6.22% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGIAX Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A | 9.05% | 9.99% | 7.46% | 2.27% | 6.11% | 7.20% | 1.38% | 7.06% | 6.32% | 5.83% | 8.23% | 3.05% |
GIDGX Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio | 6.22% | 5.92% | 12.06% | 4.32% | 8.89% | 8.41% | 1.99% | 4.85% | 5.67% | 3.35% | 2.97% | 3.21% |
Drawdowns
FGIAX vs. GIDGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGIAX drawdown since its inception was -49.35%, which is greater than GIDGX's maximum drawdown of -31.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGIAX and GIDGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGIAX | GIDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -49.35% | -31.63% | -17.72% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -10.90% | +2.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.08% | -20.39% | -0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -38.02% | -31.63% | -6.39% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.06% | -4.81% | +1.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.22% | -3.90% | -3.32% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.79% | 2.20% | -0.41% |
Volatility
FGIAX vs. GIDGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Nuveen Global Infrastructure Fund Class A (FGIAX) is 4.15%, while Goldman Sachs Enhanced Dividend Global Equity Portfolio (GIDGX) has a volatility of 5.00%. This indicates that FGIAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GIDGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| FGIAX | GIDGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.15% | 5.00% | -0.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.07% | 7.79% | -0.72% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.28% | 13.14% | -0.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.08% | 12.96% | +0.12% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.17% | 14.16% | +1.01% |