FGD vs. UYLD
FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) and UYLD (Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FGD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while UYLD is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by Angel Oak. FGD is passively managed, while UYLD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FGD returned 22.51%/yr vs 5.92%/yr for UYLD. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FGD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for UYLD.
Performance
FGD vs. UYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly higher than UYLD's 2.03% return.
FGD
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- 1Y
- 32.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
UYLD
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- 0.65%
- YTD
- 2.03%
- 6M
- 2.39%
- 1Y
- 5.12%
- 3Y*
- 5.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FGD vs. UYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 12.92% | 44.42% | 5.71% | 8.20% | 17.11% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 2.03% | 5.36% | 6.10% | 6.90% | 1.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGD and UYLD is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 25, 2022 | 0.15 |
Over the past year, FGD and UYLD have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.15, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGD vs. UYLD — Risk / Return Rank
FGD
UYLD
FGD vs. UYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGD | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -18.69 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 4.49 | -3.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 37.30 | -34.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.28 | 226.63 | -215.36 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGD vs. UYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than UYLD's maximum drawdown of -0.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and UYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGD | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -0.54% | -67.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -0.14% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.50% | -0.54% | -10.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.84% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | 0.00% | -0.44% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -0.03% | -12.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 0.02% | +2.79% |
Volatility
FGD vs. UYLD - Volatility Comparison
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) has a higher volatility of 3.57% compared to Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF (UYLD) at 0.36%. This indicates that FGD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGD | UYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 0.36% | +3.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 0.50% | +9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 0.64% | +12.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 1.00% | +13.95% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 1.00% | +17.21% |
FGD vs. UYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is higher than UYLD's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGD vs. UYLD - Dividend Comparison
FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, which matches UYLD's 5.03% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.01% | 5.62% | 5.87% | 6.44% | 5.74% | 5.35% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 5.88% | 4.01% | 4.36% | 5.07% |
UYLD Angel Oak Ultrashort Income ETF | 5.03% | 5.07% | 4.97% | 5.92% | 0.75% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGD and UYLD have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGD has higher volatility (3.57%) compared to UYLD (0.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs UYLD's -0.54%.
On 3-year performance, FGD leads with 22.51% vs 5.92% for UYLD. On fees, UYLD is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, UYLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.36%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FGD has performed better with a 22.51% return vs 5.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UYLD is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.59% for FGD.
UYLD has the higher dividend yield at 5.03%, compared with 5.01% for FGD.
FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while UYLD is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and Angel Oak. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.29% for UYLD.
UYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (8.03 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGD and UYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer