FGD vs. FWD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) and FWD (AB Disruptors ETF) are both Global Equities funds. FGD is passively managed, while FWD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, FGD returned 22.45%/yr vs 39.48%/yr for FWD. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for FWD.

Performance

FGD vs. FWD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 11.09% return, which is significantly lower than FWD's 40.11% return.

FGD

• 1D: -1.27%
• 1M: 1.09%
• YTD: 11.09%
• 6M: 12.57%
• 1Y: 33.36%
• 3Y*: 22.45%
• 5Y*: 10.37%
• 10Y*: 9.79%

FWD

• 1D: -0.27%
• 1M: 14.15%
• YTD: 40.11%
• 6M: 39.78%
• 1Y: 75.95%
• 3Y*: 39.48%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGD vs. FWD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund	11.09%	44.42%	5.71%	9.35%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	40.11%	32.00%	29.23%	25.66%

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and FWD is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.53
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 23, 2023	0.52

The correlation between FGD and FWD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.53 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGD vs. FWD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	FGD	FWD
Financial Services	33.6%	0.5%
Industrials	14.3%	17.7%
Energy	10.0%	2.6%
Communication Services	9.3%	2.6%
Consumer Defensive	9.2%	0.8%
Consumer Cyclical	8.8%	2.4%
Basic Materials	6.4%	1.8%
Utilities	4.9%	1.0%
Real Estate	2.4%	0.7%
Technology	1.2%	52.6%
Healthcare	-	6.6%

Return for Risk

FGD vs. FWD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGD

FGD Risk / Return Rank: 74
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 79
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 65

FWD

FWD Risk / Return Rank: 87
FWD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
FWD Sortino Ratio Rank: 83
FWD Omega Ratio Rank: 83
FWD Calmar Ratio Rank: 91
FWD Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGD vs. FWD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and AB Disruptors ETF (FWD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FGD	FWD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.67	3.16	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.59	3.78	-0.19
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.50	-0.02
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.41	5.86	-2.45
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	12.03	20.83	-8.80
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FGD vs. FWD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.67, which is comparable to the FWD Sharpe Ratio of 3.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGD and FWD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FGD	FWD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.67	3.16	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.70	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.54	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	1.67	-1.41

Drawdowns

FGD vs. FWD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than FWD's maximum drawdown of -29.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and FWD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FGD	FWD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-68.05%	-29.02%	-39.03%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.82%	-13.03%	+3.21%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.50%	-29.02%	+17.52%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-44.84%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.05%	-0.27%	-1.78%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-12.57%	-4.06%	-8.51%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.78%	3.66%	-0.88%

Volatility

FGD vs. FWD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 3.20%, while AB Disruptors ETF (FWD) has a volatility of 7.77%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FWD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FGD	FWD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.20%	7.77%	-4.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.73%	18.96%	-9.23%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.56%	24.15%	-11.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.92%	24.72%	-9.80%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.23%	24.72%	-6.49%

FGD vs. FWD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FWD's 0.65% expense ratio.

Dividends

FGD vs. FWD - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.09%, more than FWD's 0.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund	5.09%	5.62%	5.87%	6.44%	5.74%	5.35%	6.17%	5.19%	5.88%	4.01%	4.36%	5.07%
FWD AB Disruptors ETF	0.08%	0.11%	1.89%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FGD and FWD in my portfolio?

FGD and FWD have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FGD or FWD?

FWD has higher volatility (7.77%) compared to FGD (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs FWD's -29.02%.

Which ETF is better, FGD or FWD?

On 3-year performance, FWD leads with 39.48% vs 22.45% for FGD. On fees, FGD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, FGD or FWD?

Over the 3-year period, FWD has performed better with a 39.48% return vs 22.45%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, FGD or FWD?

FGD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for FWD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, FGD or FWD?

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.09%, compared with 0.08% for FWD.

What is the main difference between FGD and FWD?

They also come from different issuers: First Trust and AllianceBernstein. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.65% for FWD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FWD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.16 vs 2.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.