FGD vs. FGM
FGD (First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund) and FGM (First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - FGD is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while FGM is a Europe Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, FGD returned 10.39%/yr vs 8.76%/yr for FGM. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FGD charges 0.59%/yr vs 0.80%/yr for FGM.
Performance
FGD vs. FGM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly higher than FGM's 3.19% return. Over the past 10 years, FGD has outperformed FGM with an annualized return of 10.39%, while FGM has yielded a comparatively lower 8.76% annualized return.
FGD
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- 12.92%
- 6M
- 13.97%
- 1Y
- 32.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.51%
- 5Y*
- 10.83%
- 10Y*
- 10.39%
FGM
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -2.19%
- YTD
- 3.19%
- 6M
- 4.60%
- 1Y
- 18.86%
- 3Y*
- 20.38%
- 5Y*
- 4.13%
- 10Y*
- 8.76%
FGD vs. FGM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 12.92% | 44.42% | 5.71% | 8.20% | -7.25% | 20.83% | -5.23% | 20.64% | -12.49% | 17.87% |
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 3.19% | 63.60% | 1.36% | 13.28% | -30.46% | 6.10% | 17.26% | 20.77% | -25.14% | 44.28% |
Correlation
The correlation between FGD and FGM is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.73 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.70 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 17, 2012 | 0.70 |
The correlation between FGD and FGM has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.70 to 0.73 - a consistent structural relationship.
FGD vs. FGM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FGD
FGM
Financial Services
Industrials
Energy
-
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
FGD
FGM
Industrials
FGD
FGM
Energy
FGD
FGM
-
Communication Services
FGD
FGM
Consumer Defensive
FGD
FGM
Consumer Cyclical
FGD
FGM
Basic Materials
FGD
FGM
Utilities
FGD
FGM
Real Estate
FGD
FGM
Technology
FGD
FGM
-
Healthcare
FGD
-
FGM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FGD vs. FGM — Risk / Return Rank
FGD
FGM
FGD vs. FGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FGD | FGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.64 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.45 | 1.16 | +0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.23 | 0.98 | +2.24 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.28 | 3.01 | +8.27 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FGD vs. FGM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than FGM's maximum drawdown of -51.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and FGM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FGD | FGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -68.05% | -51.58% | -16.47% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.82% | -17.76% | +7.94% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.50% | -17.93% | +6.43% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.68% | -50.22% | +21.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -44.84% | -51.58% | +6.74% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.44% | -8.26% | +7.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.55% | -14.72% | +2.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.81% | 5.81% | -3.00% |
Volatility
FGD vs. FGM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 3.57%, while First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund (FGM) has a volatility of 6.75%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FGD | FGM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 6.75% | -3.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.98% | 17.55% | -7.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.81% | 20.94% | -8.13% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.95% | 24.54% | -9.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.21% | 23.11% | -4.90% |
FGD vs. FGM - Expense Ratio Comparison
FGD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than FGM's 0.80% expense ratio.
Dividends
FGD vs. FGM - Dividend Comparison
FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than FGM's 0.64% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGD First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund | 5.01% | 5.62% | 5.87% | 6.44% | 5.74% | 5.35% | 6.17% | 5.19% | 5.88% | 4.01% | 4.36% | 5.07% |
FGM First Trust Germany AlphaDEX Fund | 0.64% | 0.66% | 2.56% | 2.82% | 5.44% | 1.43% | 1.33% | 2.30% | 2.18% | 2.11% | 1.33% | 1.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FGD and FGM have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FGM has higher volatility (6.75%) compared to FGD (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs FGM's -51.58%.
On 10-year performance, FGD leads with 10.39% vs 8.76% for FGM. On fees, FGD is cheaper at 0.59% per year. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FGD has performed better with a 10.39% return vs 8.76%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FGD is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FGM.
FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 0.64% for FGM.
FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while FGM is Europe Equities. FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while FGM tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Germany Index. Their fees differ too: 0.59% for FGD and 0.80% for FGM.
FGD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FGD and FGM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer