PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FGD vs. EPU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FGD vs. EPU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FGD achieves a 12.92% return, which is significantly lower than EPU's 21.02% return. Over the past 10 years, FGD has underperformed EPU with an annualized return of 10.39%, while EPU has yielded a comparatively higher 15.16% annualized return.


FGD

1D
0.35%
1M
1.25%
YTD
12.92%
6M
13.97%
1Y
32.81%
3Y*
22.51%
5Y*
10.83%
10Y*
10.39%

EPU

1D
2.12%
1M
4.37%
YTD
21.02%
6M
26.87%
1Y
85.51%
3Y*
46.38%
5Y*
28.15%
10Y*
15.16%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FGD vs. EPU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
12.92%44.42%5.71%8.20%-7.25%20.83%-5.23%20.64%-12.49%17.87%
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
21.02%86.87%21.73%25.34%2.05%-11.81%-4.31%7.30%-12.17%29.70%

Correlation

The correlation between FGD and EPU is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.53

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2009

0.59

The correlation between FGD and EPU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.

FGD vs. EPU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FGD
EPU

Financial Services

33.6%
28.8%

Industrials

14.3%
2.8%

Energy

10.0%

-

Communication Services

9.3%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

9.2%
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

8.8%
4.1%

Basic Materials

6.4%
52.7%

Utilities

4.9%
2.8%

Real Estate

2.4%
3.2%

Technology

1.2%

-

Healthcare

-

1.2%

Financial Services

FGD
33.6%
EPU
28.8%

Industrials

FGD
14.3%
EPU
2.8%

Energy

FGD
10.0%
EPU

-

Communication Services

FGD
9.3%
EPU
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

FGD
9.2%
EPU
3.0%

Consumer Cyclical

FGD
8.8%
EPU
4.1%

Basic Materials

FGD
6.4%
EPU
52.7%

Utilities

FGD
4.9%
EPU
2.8%

Real Estate

FGD
2.4%
EPU
3.2%

Technology

FGD
1.2%
EPU

-

Healthcare

FGD

-

EPU
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FGD vs. EPU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FGD
FGD Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
FGD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FGD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FGD Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
FGD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FGD Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

EPU
EPU Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
EPU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
EPU Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
EPU Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
EPU Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
EPU Martin Ratio Rank: 7272
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FGD vs. EPU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) and iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FGDEPUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.25

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.23

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.45

1.43

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.23

4.07

-0.84

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.28

11.73

-0.45

FGD vs. EPU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FGD Sharpe Ratio is 2.48, which is comparable to the EPU Sharpe Ratio of 2.73. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FGD and EPU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FGD vs. EPU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FGD drawdown since its inception was -68.05%, which is greater than EPU's maximum drawdown of -60.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FGD and EPU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FGDEPUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-68.05%

-60.62%

-7.43%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.82%

-20.85%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.50%

-20.85%

+9.35%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.68%

-35.59%

+6.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-44.84%

-50.97%

+6.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.44%

-6.69%

+6.25%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.55%

-18.81%

+6.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.81%

7.22%

-4.41%

Volatility

FGD vs. EPU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund (FGD) is 3.57%, while iShares MSCI Peru ETF (EPU) has a volatility of 13.52%. This indicates that FGD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EPU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FGDEPUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.57%

13.52%

-9.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.98%

26.94%

-16.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

31.04%

-18.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.95%

25.11%

-10.16%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.21%

23.64%

-5.43%

FGD vs. EPU - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both FGD and EPU have an expense ratio of 0.59%.


Dividends

FGD vs. EPU - Dividend Comparison

FGD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.01%, more than EPU's 1.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
EPU
iShares MSCI Peru ETF
1.35%1.63%5.78%4.17%5.56%3.13%1.91%2.67%1.53%3.30%0.85%1.90%
FGD
First Trust Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index Fund
5.01%5.62%5.87%6.44%5.74%5.35%6.17%5.19%5.88%4.01%4.36%5.07%

Frequently Asked Questions


FGD and EPU have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

EPU has higher volatility (13.52%) compared to FGD (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FGD dropped -68.05% vs EPU's -60.62%.

On 10-year performance, EPU leads with 15.16% vs 10.39% for FGD. Both ETFs have the same 0.59% expense ratio. On volatility, FGD has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, EPU has performed better with a 15.16% return vs 10.39%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FGD and EPU have the same expense ratio: 0.59% per year.

FGD has the higher dividend yield at 5.01%, compared with 1.35% for EPU.

FGD is categorized as Global Equities, while EPU is Mid Cap Blend Equities. FGD tracks Dow Jones Global Select Dividend Index, while EPU tracks MSCI All Peru Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: First Trust and iShares.

EPU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.73 vs 2.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FGD and EPU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer