PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFUT vs. ONEQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFUT vs. ONEQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFUT achieves a 12.74% return, which is significantly lower than ONEQ's 16.16% return.


FFUT

1D
-0.90%
1M
1.16%
YTD
12.74%
6M
14.35%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

ONEQ

1D
-0.85%
1M
7.21%
YTD
16.16%
6M
15.18%
1Y
39.62%
3Y*
27.68%
5Y*
15.43%
10Y*
19.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFUT vs. ONEQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
12.74%8.26%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
16.16%20.85%

Correlation

The correlation between FFUT and ONEQ is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 6, 2025

0.05

FFUT vs. ONEQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFUT
ONEQ

Technology

65.3%
50.8%

Financial Services

7.4%
3.1%

Communication Services

5.4%
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

5.2%
13.3%

Industrials

4.5%
2.9%

Healthcare

4.2%
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

2.4%
5.2%

Energy

2.0%
0.6%

Utilities

1.7%
0.9%

Real Estate

0.9%
0.6%

Basic Materials

0.9%
1.0%

Technology

FFUT
65.3%
ONEQ
50.8%

Financial Services

FFUT
7.4%
ONEQ
3.1%

Communication Services

FFUT
5.4%
ONEQ
16.7%

Consumer Cyclical

FFUT
5.2%
ONEQ
13.3%

Industrials

FFUT
4.5%
ONEQ
2.9%

Healthcare

FFUT
4.2%
ONEQ
5.1%

Consumer Defensive

FFUT
2.4%
ONEQ
5.2%

Energy

FFUT
2.0%
ONEQ
0.6%

Utilities

FFUT
1.7%
ONEQ
0.9%

Real Estate

FFUT
0.9%
ONEQ
0.6%

Basic Materials

FFUT
0.9%
ONEQ
1.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFUT vs. ONEQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFUT

ONEQ
ONEQ Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
ONEQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ONEQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
ONEQ Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
ONEQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
ONEQ Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFUT vs. ONEQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Managed Futures ETF (FFUT) and Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF (ONEQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

FFUT vs. ONEQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFUTONEQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.48

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.70

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.91

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.01

0.65

+1.35

Drawdowns

FFUT vs. ONEQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFUT drawdown since its inception was -2.84%, smaller than the maximum ONEQ drawdown of -55.09%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFUT and ONEQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFUTONEQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-55.09%

+52.25%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.64%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.23%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.90%

-0.85%

-0.05%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.88%

-7.95%

+7.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.19%

Volatility

FFUT vs. ONEQ - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFUTONEQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.20%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.17%

16.05%

-4.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.17%

22.14%

-10.97%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.17%

21.71%

-10.54%

FFUT vs. ONEQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFUT has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than ONEQ's 0.21% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFUT vs. ONEQ - Dividend Comparison

FFUT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than ONEQ's 0.67% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFUT
Fidelity Managed Futures ETF
1.85%2.09%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
ONEQ
Fidelity Nasdaq Composite Index ETF
0.67%0.54%0.65%0.71%0.97%0.54%0.71%2.51%1.08%0.84%1.12%1.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFUT and ONEQ have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ONEQ is cheaper at 0.21% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ONEQ is cheaper with a 0.21% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for FFUT.

FFUT has the higher dividend yield at 1.85%, compared with 0.67% for ONEQ.

FFUT is categorized as Systematic Trend, while ONEQ is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for FFUT and 0.21% for ONEQ.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFUT and ONEQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer