FFSM vs. FULVX
FFSM (Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF) and FULVX (Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund) are both funds - FFSM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Fidelity, while FULVX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund managed by Fidelity. Over the past 5 years, FFSM returned 10.42%/yr vs 5.24%/yr for FULVX. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. FFSM charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for FULVX.
Performance
FFSM vs. FULVX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFSM achieves a 18.72% return, which is significantly higher than FULVX's -0.01% return.
FFSM
- 1D
- 1.65%
- 1M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 18.72%
- 6M
- 20.25%
- 1Y
- 40.12%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 10.42%
- 10Y*
- —
FULVX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -0.69%
- YTD
- -0.01%
- 6M
- -0.72%
- 1Y
- 0.65%
- 3Y*
- 9.47%
- 5Y*
- 5.24%
- 10Y*
- —
FFSM vs. FULVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF | 18.72% | 14.89% | 14.38% | 17.30% | -16.35% | 19.77% |
FULVX Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund | -0.01% | 5.23% | 17.76% | 6.38% | -10.43% | 17.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFSM and FULVX is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2021 | 0.72 |
Over the past year, the correlation between FFSM and FULVX has dropped to 0.50 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFSM vs. FULVX — Risk / Return Rank
FFSM
FULVX
FFSM vs. FULVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) and Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund (FULVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFSM | FULVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 2.24 | 0.00 | +2.24 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.14 | 0.06 | +3.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.01 | +0.38 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.84 | 0.47 | +3.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.60 | 1.37 | +14.23 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFSM | FULVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.24 | 0.00 | +2.24 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.43 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.59 | 0.40 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
FFSM vs. FULVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFSM drawdown since its inception was -26.65%, smaller than the maximum FULVX drawdown of -33.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFSM and FULVX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFSM | FULVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -26.65% | -33.24% | +6.59% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.37% | -6.33% | -4.04% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.78% | -10.31% | -14.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.65% | -18.64% | -8.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.74% | -3.95% | +3.21% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.86% | -5.09% | -2.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.55% | 2.16% | +0.39% |
Volatility
FFSM vs. FULVX - Volatility Comparison
Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF (FFSM) has a higher volatility of 5.78% compared to Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund (FULVX) at 1.84%. This indicates that FFSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FULVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFSM | FULVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.78% | 1.84% | +3.94% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.99% | 5.81% | +8.18% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.96% | 8.38% | +9.58% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.66% | 12.19% | +8.47% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.58% | 16.22% | +4.36% |
FFSM vs. FULVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFSM has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than FULVX's 0.66% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFSM vs. FULVX - Dividend Comparison
FFSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, less than FULVX's 13.25% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFSM Fidelity Fundamental Small-Mid Cap ETF | 0.46% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.56% | 0.58% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FULVX Fidelity U.S. Low Volatility Equity Fund | 13.25% | 6.82% | 5.76% | 1.65% | 4.98% | 5.35% | 0.62% | 0.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFSM and FULVX have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FFSM has higher volatility (5.78%) compared to FULVX (1.84%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFSM dropped -26.65% vs FULVX's -33.24%.
FFSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 0.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFSM and FULVX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer