PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFOX vs. XFLX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFOX vs. XFLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) and FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFOX achieves a 5.76% return, which is significantly higher than XFLX's 1.14% return.


FFOX

1D
-0.79%
1M
3.07%
YTD
5.76%
6M
3.59%
1Y
16.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XFLX

1D
-0.11%
1M
0.37%
YTD
1.14%
6M
1.26%
1Y
4.36%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFOX vs. XFLX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
FFOX
FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF
5.76%10.29%
XFLX
FundX Flexible ETF
1.14%3.67%

Correlation

The correlation between FFOX and XFLX is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 10, 2025

0.68

The correlation between FFOX and XFLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.68 to 0.68 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFOX vs. XFLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFOX
FFOX Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
FFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2929
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

XFLX
XFLX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
XFLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XFLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3636
Sortino Ratio Rank
XFLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
XFLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
XFLX Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFOX vs. XFLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) and FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFOXXFLXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.27

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.17

1.23

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.33

1.41

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.01

5.73

-0.72

FFOX vs. XFLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFOX Sharpe Ratio is 0.94, which is comparable to the XFLX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFOX and XFLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFOX vs. XFLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFOX drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, which is greater than XFLX's maximum drawdown of -6.54%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOX and XFLX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFOXXFLXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.41%

-6.54%

-5.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-3.11%

-9.30%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-0.47%

-1.20%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.23%

-0.94%

-1.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.28%

0.76%

+2.52%

Volatility

FFOX vs. XFLX - Volatility Comparison

FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) has a higher volatility of 5.16% compared to FundX Flexible ETF (XFLX) at 1.07%. This indicates that FFOX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XFLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFOXXFLXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.16%

1.07%

+4.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.96%

3.10%

+10.86%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.63%

3.63%

+14.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.49%

4.68%

+12.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.49%

4.68%

+12.81%

FFOX vs. XFLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFOX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is lower than XFLX's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFOX vs. XFLX - Dividend Comparison

FFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than XFLX's 9.69% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
FFOX
FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF
1.71%1.81%0.00%0.00%
XFLX
FundX Flexible ETF
9.69%9.80%4.55%4.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFOX and XFLX have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFOX has higher volatility (5.16%) compared to XFLX (1.07%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFOX dropped -12.41% vs XFLX's -6.54%.

On 1-year performance, FFOX leads with 16.40% vs 4.36% for XFLX. On fees, FFOX is cheaper at 1.02% per year. On volatility, XFLX has been the lower-risk option at 1.07%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, FFOX has performed better with a 16.40% return vs 4.36%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

FFOX is cheaper with a 1.02% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for XFLX.

XFLX has the higher dividend yield at 9.69%, compared with 1.71% for FFOX.

FFOX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while XFLX is Multisector Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for FFOX and 1.17% for XFLX.

XFLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 0.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFOX and XFLX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer