FFOX vs. UGA
FFOX (FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF) and UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - FFOX is a Mid Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by FundX, while UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline. FFOX is actively managed, while UGA is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.30, they often move in opposite directions. FFOX charges 1.02%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for UGA.
Performance
FFOX vs. UGA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFOX achieves a 4.58% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 70.69% return.
FFOX
- 1D
- 1.35%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- 4.58%
- 6M
- 2.59%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UGA
- 1D
- -2.73%
- 1M
- -12.25%
- YTD
- 70.69%
- 6M
- 59.72%
- 1Y
- 79.48%
- 3Y*
- 20.80%
- 5Y*
- 24.41%
- 10Y*
- 14.27%
FFOX vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF | 4.58% | 9.95% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 70.69% | 2.42% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFOX and UGA is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2025 | -0.30 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFOX vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank
FFOX
UGA
FFOX vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF (FFOX) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFOX | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.27 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.71 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.38 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.89 | 0.12 | +0.77 |
Drawdowns
FFOX vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFOX drawdown since its inception was -12.41%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFOX and UGA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFOX | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -12.41% | -86.59% | +74.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -14.88% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -26.68% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -38.11% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.76% | -14.75% | +11.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -36.76% | +34.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 6.20% | — |
Volatility
FFOX vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFOX | UGA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 11.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 30.48% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.31% | 35.27% | -17.96% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 34.40% | -17.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 17.31% | 37.27% | -19.96% |
FFOX vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFOX has a 1.02% expense ratio, which is higher than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFOX vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison
FFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
FFOX FundX Future Fund Opportunities ETF | 1.73% | 1.81% |
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFOX and UGA have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UGA is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UGA is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for FFOX.
FFOX has the higher dividend yield at 1.73%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
FFOX is categorized as Mid Cap Growth Equities, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: FundX and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 1.02% for FFOX and 0.75% for UGA.
Find the right allocation for FFOX and UGA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer