FFND vs. OILK
FFND (The Future Fund Active ETF) and OILK (ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - FFND is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund actively managed by The Future Fund, while OILK is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Balanced WTI Crude Oil Index. FFND is actively managed, while OILK is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, FFND returned 21.85%/yr vs 19.03%/yr for OILK. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. FFND charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for OILK.
Performance
FFND vs. OILK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFND achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.
FFND
- 1D
- -1.07%
- 1M
- 2.89%
- YTD
- 6.70%
- 6M
- 6.37%
- 1Y
- 21.25%
- 3Y*
- 21.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
OILK
- 1D
- 1.40%
- 1M
- -1.65%
- YTD
- 64.22%
- 6M
- 60.70%
- 1Y
- 58.99%
- 3Y*
- 19.03%
- 5Y*
- 17.73%
- 10Y*
- —
FFND vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFND The Future Fund Active ETF | 6.70% | 19.38% | 24.05% | 40.05% | -39.84% | -4.81% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 64.22% | -11.86% | 8.18% | -0.97% | 27.57% | 13.76% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFND and OILK is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2021 | 0.09 |
The correlation between FFND and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
FFND vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
FFND
OILK
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Financial Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
FFND
OILK
-
Industrials
FFND
OILK
-
Financial Services
FFND
OILK
-
Consumer Cyclical
FFND
OILK
Healthcare
FFND
OILK
-
Communication Services
FFND
OILK
-
Consumer Defensive
FFND
OILK
-
Utilities
FFND
OILK
-
Basic Materials
FFND
OILK
-
Energy
FFND
OILK
-
Real Estate
FFND
OILK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFND vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank
FFND
OILK
FFND vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| FFND | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.41 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.20 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.34 | -0.04 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.03 | 3.42 | -1.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.89 | 6.91 | +1.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| FFND | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.06 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.59 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 0.12 | +0.09 |
Drawdowns
FFND vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFND drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFND and OILK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFND | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -47.84% | -83.76% | +35.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.53% | -17.35% | +6.82% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.90% | -23.42% | +4.52% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -34.69% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.07% | -3.66% | +2.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.79% | -32.61% | +13.82% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.40% | 8.56% | -6.16% |
Volatility
FFND vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) is 3.78%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that FFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFND | OILK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.78% | 10.44% | -6.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.20% | 23.26% | -13.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.91% | 28.75% | -15.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 30.12% | -5.08% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.04% | 35.97% | -10.93% |
FFND vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFND has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFND vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison
FFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFND The Future Fund Active ETF | 0.61% | 0.65% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.03% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
OILK ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF | 8.18% | 4.79% | 3.11% | 5.80% | 17.32% | 68.82% | 0.13% | 0.94% | 0.58% | 6.17% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFND and OILK have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to FFND (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFND dropped -47.84% vs OILK's -83.76%.
On 3-year performance, FFND leads with 21.85% vs 19.03% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, FFND has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, FFND has performed better with a 21.85% return vs 19.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FFND.
OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.61% for FFND.
FFND is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: The Future Fund and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FFND and 0.68% for OILK.
OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for FFND and OILK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer