PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFND vs. OILK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFND vs. OILK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFND achieves a 6.70% return, which is significantly lower than OILK's 64.22% return.


FFND

1D
-1.07%
1M
2.89%
YTD
6.70%
6M
6.37%
1Y
21.25%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
10Y*

OILK

1D
1.40%
1M
-1.65%
YTD
64.22%
6M
60.70%
1Y
58.99%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
17.73%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFND vs. OILK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
FFND
The Future Fund Active ETF
6.70%19.38%24.05%40.05%-39.84%-4.81%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
64.22%-11.86%8.18%-0.97%27.57%13.76%

Correlation

The correlation between FFND and OILK is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 25, 2021

0.09

The correlation between FFND and OILK shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

FFND vs. OILK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
FFND
OILK

Technology

26.1%

-

Industrials

14.2%

-

Financial Services

13.7%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
100.0%

Healthcare

11.0%

-

Communication Services

10.9%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.4%

-

Utilities

2.0%

-

Basic Materials

1.7%

-

Energy

1.7%

-

Real Estate

1.5%

-

Technology

FFND
26.1%
OILK

-

Industrials

FFND
14.2%
OILK

-

Financial Services

FFND
13.7%
OILK

-

Consumer Cyclical

FFND
12.7%
OILK
100.0%

Healthcare

FFND
11.0%
OILK

-

Communication Services

FFND
10.9%
OILK

-

Consumer Defensive

FFND
4.4%
OILK

-

Utilities

FFND
2.0%
OILK

-

Basic Materials

FFND
1.7%
OILK

-

Energy

FFND
1.7%
OILK

-

Real Estate

FFND
1.5%
OILK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFND vs. OILK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFND
FFND Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
FFND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4747
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFND Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFND Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
FFND Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFND Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

OILK
OILK Risk / Return Rank: 5555
Overall Rank
OILK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OILK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
OILK Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
OILK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
OILK Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFND vs. OILK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) and ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFNDOILKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.41

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.34

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.03

3.42

-1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.89

6.91

+1.97

FFND vs. OILK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFND Sharpe Ratio is 1.66, which is comparable to the OILK Sharpe Ratio of 2.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFND and OILK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFNDOILKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.66

2.06

-0.41

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.20

0.12

+0.09

Drawdowns

FFND vs. OILK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFND drawdown since its inception was -47.84%, smaller than the maximum OILK drawdown of -83.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFND and OILK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFNDOILKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-47.84%

-83.76%

+35.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.53%

-17.35%

+6.82%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.90%

-23.42%

+4.52%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-34.69%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.07%

-3.66%

+2.59%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.79%

-32.61%

+13.82%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.40%

8.56%

-6.16%

Volatility

FFND vs. OILK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for The Future Fund Active ETF (FFND) is 3.78%, while ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF (OILK) has a volatility of 10.44%. This indicates that FFND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than OILK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFNDOILKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

10.44%

-6.66%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.20%

23.26%

-13.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.91%

28.75%

-15.84%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.04%

30.12%

-5.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.04%

35.97%

-10.93%

FFND vs. OILK - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFND has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than OILK's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFND vs. OILK - Dividend Comparison

FFND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.61%, less than OILK's 8.18% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFND
The Future Fund Active ETF
0.61%0.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OILK
ProShares K-1 Free Crude Oil Strategy ETF
8.18%4.79%3.11%5.80%17.32%68.82%0.13%0.94%0.58%6.17%

Frequently Asked Questions


FFND and OILK have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

OILK has higher volatility (10.44%) compared to FFND (3.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFND dropped -47.84% vs OILK's -83.76%.

On 3-year performance, FFND leads with 21.85% vs 19.03% for OILK. On fees, OILK is cheaper at 0.68% per year. On volatility, FFND has been the lower-risk option at 3.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, FFND has performed better with a 21.85% return vs 19.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

OILK is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for FFND.

OILK has the higher dividend yield at 8.18%, compared with 0.61% for FFND.

FFND is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while OILK is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: The Future Fund and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for FFND and 0.68% for OILK.

OILK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.06 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFND and OILK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer