FFLS vs. ATTR
FFLS (Future Fund Long/Short ETF) and ATTR (Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF) are both Long-Short funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.58 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. FFLS charges 1.75%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for ATTR.
Performance
FFLS vs. ATTR - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFLS achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than ATTR's 5.14% return.
FFLS
- 1D
- 1.47%
- 1M
- -0.49%
- 6M
- -0.32%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 1Y
- -2.14%
- 3Y*
- 10.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.14%
ATTR
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 1.07%
- 6M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $612.88K | $317.38K | $173.45K | |
| $154.32K | $128.25K | $158.86K |
FFLS vs. ATTR - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
FFLS Future Fund Long/Short ETF | 0.09% | -1.10% |
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 5.14% | 0.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFLS and ATTR is 0.58, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025 | 0.58 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFLS vs. ATTR — Risk / Return Rank
FFLS
ATTR
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FFLS vs. ATTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Future Fund Long/Short ETF (FFLS) and Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFLS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.97 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.38 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFLS vs. ATTR - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFLS drawdown since its inception was -11.05%, which is greater than ATTR's maximum drawdown of -1.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLS and ATTR.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFLS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -11.05% | -1.76% | -9.29% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.05% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.05% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.62% | 0.00% | -4.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.27% | -0.24% | -3.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.68% | — | — |
Volatility
FFLS vs. ATTR - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFLS | ATTR | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.88% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.47% | 3.31% | +7.16% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.50% | 3.31% | +8.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 11.50% | 3.31% | +8.19% |
FFLS vs. ATTR - Expense Ratio Comparison
FFLS has a 1.75% expense ratio, which is higher than ATTR's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
FFLS vs. ATTR - Dividend Comparison
FFLS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.57%, while ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
ATTR Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FFLS Future Fund Long/Short ETF | 6.57% | 6.58% | 3.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
FFLS and ATTR have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 1.75% for FFLS.
FFLS has the higher dividend yield at 6.57%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.
They also come from different issuers: Future Fund and Arin. Their fees differ too: 1.75% for FFLS and 0.63% for ATTR.
Find the right allocation for FFLS and ATTR
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer