PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFLDX vs. TTRIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFLDX vs. TTRIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2055 Fund (TTRIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLDX achieves a 11.91% return, which is significantly higher than TTRIX's 9.70% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFLDX having a 12.38% annualized return and TTRIX not far behind at 11.85%.


FFLDX

1D
-0.14%
1M
1.79%
YTD
11.91%
6M
11.33%
1Y
26.85%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
10.11%
10Y*
12.38%

TTRIX

1D
-0.05%
1M
2.12%
YTD
9.70%
6M
9.08%
1Y
23.94%
3Y*
17.55%
5Y*
9.07%
10Y*
11.85%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLDX vs. TTRIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
11.91%21.48%14.18%19.93%-17.32%15.93%16.52%26.02%-7.16%20.57%
TTRIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2055 Fund
9.70%18.93%14.46%20.24%-17.79%16.55%17.51%26.37%-9.93%20.90%

Correlation

The correlation between FFLDX and TTRIX is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.99

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.99

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2015

0.98

The correlation between FFLDX and TTRIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFLDX vs. TTRIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLDX
FFLDX Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
FFLDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7070
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFLDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFLDX Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
FFLDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFLDX Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

TTRIX
TTRIX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
TTRIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TTRIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
TTRIX Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
TTRIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
TTRIX Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLDX vs. TTRIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) and TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2055 Fund (TTRIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


FFLDXTTRIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.37

+0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.09

2.65

+0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

13.34

11.41

+1.94

FFLDX vs. TTRIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLDX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the TTRIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLDX and TTRIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

FFLDX vs. TTRIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLDX drawdown since its inception was -30.72%, smaller than the maximum TTRIX drawdown of -32.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLDX and TTRIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFLDXTTRIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.72%

-32.75%

+2.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.06%

-9.43%

+0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.74%

-15.81%

+1.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.18%

-25.87%

-0.31%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.72%

-32.75%

+2.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.63%

-0.14%

-0.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.55%

-4.79%

+0.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.09%

2.18%

-0.09%

Volatility

FFLDX vs. TTRIX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund (FFLDX) has a higher volatility of 5.06% compared to TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2055 Fund (TTRIX) at 4.78%. This indicates that FFLDX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than TTRIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFLDXTTRIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.06%

4.78%

+0.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.45%

10.29%

+0.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.51%

12.54%

-0.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.56%

14.97%

-0.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.22%

16.23%

-1.01%

FFLDX vs. TTRIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLDX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TTRIX's 0.22% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

FFLDX vs. TTRIX - Dividend Comparison

FFLDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.72%, less than TTRIX's 5.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFLDX
Fidelity Freedom Index 2055 Fund
1.72%2.00%2.02%1.96%3.04%1.99%1.91%10.83%2.39%1.97%2.42%2.32%
TTRIX
TIAA-CREF Lifecycle 2055 Fund
5.94%6.52%3.91%1.88%8.28%10.18%5.68%5.23%4.77%0.79%3.41%3.02%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.99, FFLDX and TTRIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFLDX has higher volatility (5.06%) compared to TTRIX (4.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFLDX dropped -30.72% vs TTRIX's -32.75%.

FFLDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 2.00), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFLDX and TTRIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer