FFLC vs. FETH

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH).

FFLC and FETH are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. FFLC is an actively managed fund by Fidelity. It was launched on Jun 2, 2020. FETH is a passively managed fund by Fidelity that tracks the performance of the Fidelity Ethereum Reference Rate Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2024.

Performance

FFLC vs. FETH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

FFLC vs. FETH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	-3.67%	17.67%	4.99%
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	-29.48%	-11.37%	-3.61%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFLC achieves a -3.67% return, which is significantly higher than FETH's -29.48% return.

FFLC

• 1D: 3.48%
• 1M: -5.49%
• YTD: -3.67%
• 6M: -0.80%
• 1Y: 19.26%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 14.40%
• 10Y*: —

FETH

• 1D: 3.67%
• 1M: 8.89%
• YTD: -29.48%
• 6M: -49.75%
• 1Y: 14.41%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFLC vs. FETH - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFLC has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FETH's 0.00% expense ratio.

FFLC

Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF

FETH

Fidelity Ethereum Fund

Return for Risk

FFLC vs. FETH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFLC

FFLC Risk / Return Rank: 67
FFLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 62
FFLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 64
FFLC Omega Ratio Rank: 67
FFLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FFLC Martin Ratio Rank: 73

FETH

FETH Risk / Return Rank: 21
FETH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 18
FETH Sortino Ratio Rank: 31
FETH Omega Ratio Rank: 26
FETH Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
FETH Martin Ratio Rank: 15

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFLC vs. FETH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) and Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	FFLC	FETH	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.04	0.19	+0.85
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.55	0.84	+0.71
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.23	1.10	+0.14
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.65	0.19	+1.46
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.14	0.38	+6.75
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

FFLC vs. FETH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFLC Sharpe Ratio is 1.04, which is higher than the FETH Sharpe Ratio of 0.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFLC and FETH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	FFLC	FETH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.04	0.19	+0.85
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.85	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.04	-0.35	+1.39

Correlation

The correlation between FFLC and FETH is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

FFLC vs. FETH - Dividend Comparison

FFLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, while FETH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
FFLC Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF	1.14%	1.10%	0.82%	0.57%	1.67%	1.68%	0.89%
FETH Fidelity Ethereum Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

FFLC vs. FETH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFLC drawdown since its inception was -19.72%, smaller than the maximum FETH drawdown of -64.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFLC and FETH.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFLC	FETH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-19.72%	-64.00%	+44.28%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.92%	-61.74%	+49.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.72%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.85%	-56.86%	+50.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.05%	-30.47%	+27.42%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.76%	30.48%	-27.72%

Volatility

FFLC vs. FETH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fundamental Large Cap Core ETF (FFLC) is 6.13%, while Fidelity Ethereum Fund (FETH) has a volatility of 19.25%. This indicates that FFLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FETH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFLC	FETH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.13%	19.25%	-13.12%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.24%	53.53%	-43.29%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.67%	75.83%	-57.16%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.94%	74.85%	-57.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	17.78%	74.85%	-57.07%