FFIDX vs. QLD

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

FFIDX (Fidelity Fund) and QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) are both funds - FFIDX is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Fidelity, while QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). Over the past 10 years, FFIDX returned 15.27%/yr vs 35.67%/yr for QLD. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFIDX charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for QLD.

Performance

FFIDX vs. QLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFIDX achieves a 1.42% return, which is significantly lower than QLD's 32.65% return. Over the past 10 years, FFIDX has underperformed QLD with an annualized return of 15.27%, while QLD has yielded a comparatively higher 35.67% annualized return.

FFIDX

• 1D: 1.17%
• 1M: -2.42%
• YTD: 1.42%
• 6M: 2.47%
• 1Y: 19.24%
• 3Y*: 20.25%
• 5Y*: 12.27%
• 10Y*: 15.27%

QLD

• 1D: 1.30%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 32.65%
• 6M: 32.82%
• 1Y: 73.89%
• 3Y*: 44.57%
• 5Y*: 23.24%
• 10Y*: 35.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFIDX vs. QLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
FFIDX Fidelity Fund	1.42%	20.04%	27.13%	30.93%	-25.88%	33.22%	26.43%	33.46%	-5.31%	23.28%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	32.65%	30.36%	42.82%	117.72%	-60.52%	54.67%	88.90%	81.69%	-8.31%	70.34%

Correlation

The correlation between FFIDX and QLD is 0.84, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.84
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2006	0.91

The correlation between FFIDX and QLD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFIDX vs. QLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFIDX

FFIDX Risk / Return Rank: 37
FFIDX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 39
FFIDX Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
FFIDX Omega Ratio Rank: 37
FFIDX Calmar Ratio Rank: 30
FFIDX Martin Ratio Rank: 39

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 64
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 61
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 64
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 64
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 61

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFIDX vs. QLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) and ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFIDX	QLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.43	2.04	-0.60
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.05	2.48	-0.44
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.33	-0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.68	2.78	-1.09
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.01	9.46	-2.45

FFIDX vs. QLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFIDX Sharpe Ratio is 1.43, which is comparable to the QLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFIDX and QLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFIDX vs. QLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFIDX drawdown since its inception was -55.35%, smaller than the maximum QLD drawdown of -83.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFIDX and QLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFIDX	QLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-55.35%	-83.13%	+27.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.87%	-25.13%	+14.26%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.42%	-42.29%	+19.87%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.33%	-63.68%	+33.35%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.66%	-63.68%	+33.02%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.92%	-7.11%	+4.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.85%	-18.16%	+6.31%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.61%	7.36%	-4.75%

Volatility

FFIDX vs. QLD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Fidelity Fund (FFIDX) is 3.70%, while ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a volatility of 15.14%. This indicates that FFIDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFIDX	QLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.70%	15.14%	-11.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.48%	27.51%	-18.03%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.77%	34.29%	-21.52%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.18%	45.07%	-25.89%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.43%	44.73%	-25.30%

FFIDX vs. QLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFIDX has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than QLD's 0.95% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFIDX vs. QLD - Dividend Comparison

FFIDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%, more than QLD's 0.13% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FFIDX Fidelity Fund	1.16%	1.18%	0.00%	2.41%	0.67%	4.60%	2.71%	5.41%	7.40%	11.12%	7.01%	5.48%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFIDX and QLD in my portfolio?

FFIDX and QLD have a correlation of 0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, FFIDX or QLD?

QLD has higher volatility (15.14%) compared to FFIDX (3.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFIDX dropped -55.35% vs QLD's -83.13%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.