FFH.TO vs. EAT
FFH.TO (Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited) and EAT (Brinker International, Inc.) are both stocks. FFH.TO operates in Insurance - Property & Casualty (Financial Services), while EAT operates in Restaurants (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 10 years, FFH.TO returned 15.19%/yr vs 15.67%/yr for EAT. At a 0.10 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
FFH.TO vs. EAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
FFH.TO is traded in CAD, while EAT is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the EAT values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, FFH.TO achieves a -12.76% return, which is significantly lower than EAT's 13.26% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with FFH.TO having a 15.19% annualized return and EAT not far ahead at 15.67%.
FFH.TO
- 1D
- -0.71%
- 1M
- 4.27%
- YTD
- -12.76%
- 6M
- -6.84%
- 1Y
- -3.12%
- 3Y*
- 33.68%
- 5Y*
- 34.18%
- 10Y*
- 15.19%
EAT
- 1D
- 0.56%
- 1M
- 18.78%
- YTD
- 13.26%
- 6M
- 11.87%
- 1Y
- -6.21%
- 3Y*
- 64.55%
- 5Y*
- 24.74%
- 10Y*
- 15.67%
FFH.TO vs. EAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FFH.TO Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited | -12.76% | 32.23% | 66.26% | 54.96% | 31.51% | 47.26% | -27.31% | 3.64% | -8.51% | 5.43% |
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 13.26% | 3.54% | 232.31% | 32.10% | -7.26% | -35.35% | 32.93% | -5.00% | 27.13% | -23.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between FFH.TO and EAT is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.12 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2006 | 0.10 |
Fundamentals
FFH.TO:
CA$50.62B
EAT:
$7.09B
FFH.TO:
$205.21
EAT:
$10.14
FFH.TO:
7.89
EAT:
15.71
FFH.TO:
0.13
EAT:
0.36
FFH.TO:
1.22
EAT:
1.27
FFH.TO:
1.40
EAT:
17.46
FFH.TO:
$29.34B
EAT:
$5.73B
FFH.TO:
$6.18B
EAT:
$3.45B
FFH.TO:
$7.83B
EAT:
$807.20M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
FFH.TO vs. EAT — Risk / Return Rank
FFH.TO
EAT
FFH.TO vs. EAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) and Brinker International, Inc. (EAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| FFH.TO | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.09 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.01 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.12 | -0.18 | +0.06 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.27 | -0.37 | +0.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
FFH.TO vs. EAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum FFH.TO drawdown since its inception was -56.23%, smaller than the maximum EAT drawdown of -87.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFH.TO and EAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| FFH.TO | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -56.23% | -87.40% | +31.17% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.88% | -42.38% | +23.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.88% | -48.18% | +29.30% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.88% | -64.33% | +45.45% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -56.23% | -83.85% | +27.62% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.04% | -20.03% | +6.99% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.53% | -26.59% | +15.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.44% | 20.69% | -12.25% |
Volatility
FFH.TO vs. EAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited (FFH.TO) is 5.99%, while Brinker International, Inc. (EAT) has a volatility of 15.07%. This indicates that FFH.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| FFH.TO | EAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.99% | 15.07% | -9.08% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.64% | 36.79% | -19.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.63% | 47.45% | -24.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 49.51% | -25.52% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.56% | 55.55% | -29.99% |
Dividends
FFH.TO vs. EAT - Dividend Comparison
FFH.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.92%, while EAT has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EAT Brinker International, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.67% | 3.62% | 3.46% | 3.71% | 2.67% | 2.50% |
FFH.TO Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited | 0.92% | 0.83% | 1.01% | 1.10% | 1.56% | 2.03% | 3.01% | 2.18% | 2.07% | 1.95% | 2.24% | 1.82% |
Financials
FFH.TO vs. EAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited and Brinker International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
FFH.TO vs. EAT - Profitability Comparison
FFH.TO - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported a gross profit of 986.70M and revenue of 6.41B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 15.4%.
EAT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.10B and revenue of 1.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 74.6%.
FFH.TO - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.2%.
EAT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported an operating income of 166.60M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.3%.
FFH.TO - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fairfax Financial Holdings Limited reported a net income of 695.70M and revenue of 6.41B, resulting in a net margin of 10.9%.
EAT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Brinker International, Inc. reported a net income of 127.90M and revenue of 1.47B, resulting in a net margin of 8.7%.
Frequently Asked Questions
FFH.TO and EAT have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for FFH.TO and EAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer