PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGX vs. FZILX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

FFGX vs. FZILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

FFGX vs. FZILX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
2.18%27.85%-2.87%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.17%33.52%-1.19%

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFGX having a 2.18% return and FZILX slightly lower at 2.17%.


FFGX

1D
1.94%
1M
-5.33%
YTD
2.18%
6M
4.36%
1Y
22.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FZILX

1D
3.01%
1M
-6.87%
YTD
2.17%
6M
6.45%
1Y
27.85%
3Y*
16.00%
5Y*
7.70%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


FFGX vs. FZILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FZILX's 0.00% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

FFGX vs. FZILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGX
FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank

FZILX
FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGX vs. FZILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFGXFZILXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.17

1.74

-0.58

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.69

2.32

-0.64

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.35

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.77

2.44

-0.67

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.87

9.45

-2.58

FFGX vs. FZILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.17, which is lower than the FZILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and FZILX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFGXFZILXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.17

1.74

-0.58

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.06

0.49

+0.57

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and FZILX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

FFGX vs. FZILX - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.57%, less than FZILX's 2.62% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
1.57%1.62%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FZILX
Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund
2.62%2.67%3.00%2.98%2.71%2.61%1.64%2.37%0.02%

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. FZILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum FZILX drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and FZILX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGXFZILXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-34.37%

+19.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-11.24%

-1.62%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.63%

-8.57%

+0.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.11%

-6.80%

+4.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.32%

2.90%

+0.42%

Volatility

FFGX vs. FZILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) has a higher volatility of 9.51% compared to Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) at 7.90%. This indicates that FFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


FFGXFZILXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.51%

7.90%

+1.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.48%

11.25%

+2.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.37%

16.44%

+2.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.37%

15.33%

+3.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.37%

17.30%

+1.07%