FFGX vs. FZILX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

FFGX (Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF) and FZILX (Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund) are both Foreign Large Cap Equities funds from Fidelity. FFGX is actively managed, while FZILX is passively managed. Over the past year, FFGX returned 19.32% vs 28.62% for FZILX. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. FFGX charges 0.55%/yr vs 0.00%/yr for FZILX.

Performance

FFGX vs. FZILX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, FFGX achieves a 10.94% return, which is significantly lower than FZILX's 14.53% return.

FFGX

• 1D: -2.29%
• 1M: -2.14%
• 6M: 5.70%
• YTD: 10.94%
• 1Y: 19.32%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FZILX

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: 0.06%
• 6M: 10.12%
• YTD: 14.53%
• 1Y: 28.62%
• 3Y*: 19.56%
• 5Y*: 9.32%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGX vs. FZILX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF	10.94%	27.85%	-9.98%
FZILX Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund	14.53%	33.52%	-1.11%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and FZILX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.96
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2024	0.95

The correlation between FFGX and FZILX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

FFGX vs. FZILX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGX

FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 36
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 34
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 35
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 44

FZILX

FZILX Risk / Return Rank: 61
FZILX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
FZILX Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
FZILX Omega Ratio Rank: 63
FZILX Calmar Ratio Rank: 65
FZILX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGX vs. FZILX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	FFGX	FZILX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.98	1.74	-0.76
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.45	2.38	-0.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	1.33	-0.13
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.51	2.48	-0.97
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.67	9.43	-3.76

FFGX vs. FZILX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 0.98, which is lower than the FZILX Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and FZILX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. FZILX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.95%, smaller than the maximum FZILX drawdown of -34.37%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and FZILX.

Drawdown Indicators

	FFGX	FZILX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.95%	-34.37%	+19.42%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.86%	-11.24%	-1.62%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-13.47%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-29.87%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.72%	-1.75%	-3.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.90%	-6.63%	+3.73%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.42%	2.96%	+0.46%

Volatility

FFGX vs. FZILX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) has a higher volatility of 7.98% compared to Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund (FZILX) at 6.22%. This indicates that FFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FZILX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	FFGX	FZILX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.98%	6.22%	+1.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.96%	14.04%	+3.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.77%	16.01%	+3.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.67%	15.79%	+4.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.67%	17.40%	+3.27%

FFGX vs. FZILX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FZILX's 0.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

FFGX vs. FZILX - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.56%, less than FZILX's 2.34% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
FFGX Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF	1.56%	1.62%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FZILX Fidelity ZERO International Index Fund	2.34%	2.67%	3.00%	2.98%	2.71%	2.61%	1.64%	2.37%	0.02%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both FFGX and FZILX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.96, FFGX and FZILX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, FFGX or FZILX?

FFGX has higher volatility (7.98%) compared to FZILX (6.22%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGX dropped -14.95% vs FZILX's -34.37%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FZILX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 0.98), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.