PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
FFGX vs. FSGGX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

FFGX vs. FSGGX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with FFGX having a 15.12% return and FSGGX slightly lower at 15.01%.


FFGX

1D
1.03%
1M
5.38%
YTD
15.12%
6M
18.14%
1Y
26.04%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

FSGGX

1D
0.56%
1M
4.94%
YTD
15.01%
6M
18.21%
1Y
32.33%
3Y*
19.86%
5Y*
8.76%
10Y*
9.41%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

FFGX vs. FSGGX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
15.12%27.85%-2.87%
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
15.01%32.93%-1.22%

Correlation

The correlation between FFGX and FSGGX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2024

0.95

The correlation between FFGX and FSGGX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

FFGX vs. FSGGX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

FFGX
FFGX Risk / Return Rank: 4343
Overall Rank
FFGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4242
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4242
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4242
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGX Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank

FSGGX
FSGGX Risk / Return Rank: 5959
Overall Rank
FSGGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6161
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FSGGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
FSGGX Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
FSGGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
FSGGX Martin Ratio Rank: 5858
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

FFGX vs. FSGGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) and Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


FFGXFSGGXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.48

2.31

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.13

3.15

-1.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.12

2.96

-0.84

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.39

11.61

-3.22

FFGX vs. FSGGX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current FFGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.48, which is lower than the FSGGX Sharpe Ratio of 2.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of FFGX and FSGGX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


FFGXFSGGXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.48

2.31

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

0.49

+0.91

Drawdowns

FFGX vs. FSGGX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum FFGX drawdown since its inception was -14.79%, smaller than the maximum FSGGX drawdown of -34.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for FFGX and FSGGX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


FFGXFSGGXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.79%

-34.76%

+19.97%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.86%

-11.26%

-1.60%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.31%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-29.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-34.76%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.12%

-7.35%

+5.23%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.25%

2.87%

+0.38%

Volatility

FFGX vs. FSGGX - Volatility Comparison

Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF (FFGX) has a higher volatility of 6.81% compared to Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund (FSGGX) at 4.97%. This indicates that FFGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSGGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


FFGXFSGGXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.81%

4.97%

+1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.60%

12.26%

+3.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.75%

14.55%

+3.20%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.07%

15.35%

+3.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.07%

16.19%

+2.88%

FFGX vs. FSGGX - Expense Ratio Comparison

FFGX has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than FSGGX's 0.06% expense ratio.


Dividends

FFGX vs. FSGGX - Dividend Comparison

FFGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.39%, less than FSGGX's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGX
Fidelity Fundamental Global ex-U.S. ETF
1.39%1.62%0.40%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
FSGGX
Fidelity Global ex U.S. Index Fund
2.35%2.70%2.91%2.95%2.64%2.60%1.71%2.85%2.66%0.22%0.05%2.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, FFGX and FSGGX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

FFGX has higher volatility (6.81%) compared to FSGGX (4.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, FFGX dropped -14.79% vs FSGGX's -34.76%.

FSGGX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.31 vs 1.48), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for FFGX and FSGGX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer